Blog : Podcast : Classics : MP3 : Jehovah's Witnesses : Sunday School : Bookstore : Ping Us



                                              Apologetics

  v. JW
  v. Rome
  v. ignert

Boards

Links


Misc.

My church

Photo

New

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry Boards | Rules | Help The Rest of CARM is Here >>>  Home Page

ANN DEN - 1 - 1 - 1 2 3 A
  

Subject: "Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Topic #708
Reading Topic #708
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-14-02, 12:04 PM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
 
   This got buried in another thread. I thought it would be best to break it out into its own thread.

Corvus wrote:
>
>WRONG! Everlasting life is everlasting
>life, once it is given it is eternal - it hasn't been given
>because the Son of Man hasn't sat down to judge the earth.
>And you won't lose the promise of everlasting life
>for making a "mistake" you will lose it for unrepentantly
>sinning - there is a huge difference between the two.

Corvus,
Would it be possible for you to identify when the Son of Man sits down to judge the earth? I'm not asking for a year or anything like that. Simply asking where in Watchtower chronology this event is expected to happen.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-14-02 1
     RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-15-02 2
         RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-15-02 3
             RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-15-02 4
                 RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-15-02 5
                     Bump DaveSherrill Aug-18-02 6
             RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-19-02 7
                 RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-19-02 8
                     RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus desertfoxmb Aug-20-02 9
                         RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-21-02 10
                             RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus desertfoxmb Aug-22-02 13
                     Life - for Corvus msgoftruth Aug-21-02 11
                         RE: Life - for Corvus Corvus Aug-21-02 12
                             RE: Life - for Corvus msgoftruth Aug-22-02 15
                                 RE: Life - for Corvus Corvus Aug-22-02 16
                     RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-22-02 14
                         No worries Dave nt. Corvus Aug-22-02 17
                     RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-24-02 18
                         Bump - nt DaveSherrill Aug-26-02 19
                         RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus Corvus Aug-26-02 20
                             RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus DaveSherrill Aug-27-02 21
                             Stuck in a meeting DaveSherrill Aug-28-02 22
                                 Post Postponed until Labor Day DaveSherrill Sep-01-02 23
                             Corvus, how have you been mate? I posted... searcher Sep-02-02 24
                                 G'day Searcher Corvus Sep-02-02 26
                                     Thanks Corvus, how is the impending arrival? I know... searcher Sep-03-02 34
                             Salvation by Faith or by Works - ? for Corvus - Long Post DaveSherrill Sep-02-02 25
                                 Long reply :-) Corvus Sep-02-02 27
                                     Some observations Robert_V_Frazier Sep-02-02 28
                                         RE: Some observations desertfoxmb Sep-02-02 29
                                         RE: Some observations Corvus Sep-02-02 31
                                             RE: Some observations iknowhim Sep-02-02 32
                                                 RE: Some observations Corvus Sep-02-02 33
                                                     RE: Some observations iknowhim Sep-04-02 36
                                                         RE: Some observations Corvus Sep-04-02 37
                                                             Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that... Jonny Sep-04-02 38
                                                                 RE: Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that. iknowhim Sep-04-02 40
                                                                     RE: Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that. Jonny Sep-05-02 43
                                                                         what the wt said is plain for all to see iknowhim Sep-05-02 48
                                                                 Um...Jonny, your ability to... JR Sep-05-02 42
                                                                     RE: Um...Jonny, your ability to... Jonny Sep-05-02 44
                                                                         Yes, but your explanation was... JR Sep-05-02 45
                                                                             Sorry, JR Robert_V_Frazier Sep-05-02 46
                                                                                 But, Robert, all he has to do is.... JR Sep-05-02 47
                                                                                     Ok, I will try to explain the word Jonny Sep-05-02 49
                                                                                         So the big question now is... Andyman Sep-05-02 50
                                                                                             who do YOU think the real Christians are? N.T Jonny Sep-05-02 51
                                                                                                 Please don't start this again... Andyman Sep-05-02 52
                                                                                                 You know who I believe are the real Christians, it is... Jonny Sep-06-02 54
                                                                                                 RE: who do YOU think the real Christians are? N.T Truthhurts Sep-05-02 53
                                                                                                 Hello. Jonny Sep-06-02 56
                                                                                         What a flip flop! JR Sep-06-02 55
                                                             RE: Some observations iknowhim Sep-04-02 39
                                                                 RE: Some observations Robert_V_Frazier Sep-04-02 41
                                     Brief DaveSherrill Sep-02-02 30
                                         RE: Brief Corvus Sep-03-02 35
                                             Final Salvation DaveSherrill Sep-08-02 59
                                                 The end of your rope? The end of this thread? DaveSherrill Sep-15-02 60
                                                     RE: The end of your rope? The end of this thread? Jonny Sep-15-02 61
                                                         RE: The end of your rope? The end of this thread? DaveSherrill Sep-15-02 62
                                                             RE: The end of your rope? The end of this thread? Jonny Sep-16-02 64
                                                 RE: Final Salvation Corvus Sep-15-02 63
                                                     RE: Final Post DaveSherrill Sep-16-02 65
                                     Photo-documentation of Watchtower Article DaveSherrill Sep-07-02 57
                                         RE: Photo-documentation of Watchtower Article DaveSherrill Sep-07-02 58

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-14-02, 04:30 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #0
 
   G'day Dave

>Corvus,
>Would it be possible for you to identify when the Son of Man
>sits down to judge the earth? I'm not asking for a year or
>anything like that. Simply asking where in Watchtower
>chronology this event is expected to happen.
>
>Sincerely,
>Dave

Sometime after Armageddon according to Scripture. Daniel 7 says that it begins after the last beast is destroyed (7:26 - a beast in Scripture represents a government of some kind) Matthew 25:31, 32 says that it is after the worthless servant is thrown "into the outer darkness", at this time the Son of Man will take his throne and begin seperating the sheep from the goats. Revelation further expands on this and shows it to be immediately after Armageddon, which is of course the time immediately after the destruction of Satan's world and the corrupt kingdoms of mankind.

So in short it will begin immediately after Armageddon, when Christ has completed the execution of judgement against the kingdoms of man and Satan has been imprisoned in the Abyss. Exactly how long after or how long it lasts for is not indicated - though in the absence of any other indications we take the literal view that it is immediately after Armageddon and lasts for the whole millenium (ie "a thousand years is as a day and a day is as a thousand years" - that is, a celestial day rather than literally 24 hours).

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-15-02, 09:15 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #1
 
   LAST EDITED ON Aug-15-02 AT 09:17 AM (PST)
 
>G'day Dave
>
>>Corvus,
>>Would it be possible for you to identify when the Son of Man
>>sits down to judge the earth? I'm not asking for a year or
>>anything like that. Simply asking where in Watchtower
>>chronology this event is expected to happen.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Dave
>
>Sometime after Armageddon according to
>Scripture. Daniel 7 says that it begins after the last beast
>is destroyed (7:26 - a beast in Scripture represents a
>government of some kind) Matthew 25:31, 32 says that it is
>after the worthless servant is thrown "into the outer
>darkness", at this time the Son of Man will take his throne
>and begin seperating the sheep from the goats. Revelation
>further expands on this and shows it to be immediately after
>Armageddon, which is of course the time immediately after
>the destruction of Satan's world and the corrupt kingdoms of
>mankind.
>
>So in short it will begin immediately after Armageddon, when
>Christ has completed the execution of judgement against the
>kingdoms of man and Satan has been imprisoned in the Abyss.
>Exactly how long after or how long it lasts for is not
>indicated - though in the absence of any other indications
>we take the literal view that it is immediately after
>Armageddon and lasts for the whole millenium (ie "a thousand
>years is as a day and a day is as a thousand years" - that
>is, a celestial day rather than literally 24 hours).
>
>Pax
>Corvus.

Corvus,
I'm assuming that the giving of everlasting life to the "great crowd" isn't immediately after Armageddon in your view, but rather that there is a time of uplifting to perfection those who came through Armageddon plus those who will be resurrected post-A. The giving of everlasting life to these people then probably comes at the end of this probable millenium, right? Is that the basic gist of it? Or have I misread something?

Is there a difference in the timing of receiving everlasting life for the remnant? Do they get it sooner, at the same time, or later than the great crowd?

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-15-02, 03:14 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #2
 
   G'day Dave,

Well as Revelation 20:5 says, "The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed"(NASB). So it would appear that at least for some the gift of eternal life is not given until the end of the millenium.

Verse 4 and 6 tell us that there is another ressurection prior to this, during the time of the judging immediately after armageddon, this is called the "first resurrection" and consists of those who in the last days and during the tribulation who did not "worship the beast or receive its mark" and who "came to life and reigned with Christ for the thousand years." I don't know about others, but the phrase "came to life" reads to me that these people are both those who are resurrected and who survive armageddon but are not yet gifted with perfection, eternal life and/or immortality - I think it means that they are given this gift and this is what the phrase means - this matches what Christ said when he told that man, "let the dead bury the dead" in other words those who are not given (unbelievers) or promised the gift are the "dead", does that make sense?

Basically there are three stages, first are those promised the thrones and role of priesthood along with Christ, in Rev 20:4 it says "there were thrones and they sat down on them" now in the NASB the footnotes connect this to Matt 19:28 and the promise to the Apostles that they would "sit down on twelve thrones and judge Israel" and also to Rev 3:21 where he promises, "I will grant to he who overcomes to sit down with me on my throne as I also overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne." After these people there is a resurrection of those who were "beheaded for their testimony of Jesus" prior to and during the tribulation, these two groups are given their reward at the beginning of the 1,000 years. The rest are resurrected "to a resurrection of life or a resurrection of judgement" and those who do not join the Devil at the end of the millenium or who do not "die at the age of 100" for sins (see Isaiah) during the millenium will be given their gift at the end of the millenium.

Now our interpretation of this is that the first ressurection consists of the annointed, those who are sealed in Christ and who become "sharers in the divine nature" and the second ressurection (the dead who come to life at the end of the millenium) are the "great crowd" of "other sheep", many billions who are given perfect eternal life on a perfected earth. Many ridicule this as creating two "classes" but that is not how we see it, it is simply about different rewards, the ones who live eternally on earth will exist in the condition that God originally made us to have, we will probably have close contact with him and his Son just as Adam did before he sinned.

I hope that wasn't too confusing.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-15-02, 03:35 PM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #3
 
   Corvus,
Thanks for taking the time for answering.

I'll be away from the puter tonight and probably most of tomorrow, but I promise to follow up with you. I've got a couple more questions, but I'll have to wait until I have more time to read what you've said and mull it over.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-15-02, 04:04 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #4
 
   No probs, it is Friday here, I will be hanging round the net for a couple of hours and then I won't be back until Tuesday Australian time - my wife has her first ultrasound on Monday and I have the day off (Whoohoo!)

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-18-02, 11:05 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "Bump"
In response to message #5
 
   Corvus,
Hope the ultrasound goes well. I'll get back to you this week.

Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-19-02, 09:52 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #3
 
   Corvus wrote:
>Now our interpretation of this is that the first
>ressurection consists of the annointed, those who are sealed
>in Christ and who become "sharers in the divine nature" and
>the second ressurection (the dead who come to life at the
>end of the millenium) are the "great crowd" of "other
>sheep", many billions who are given perfect eternal life on
>a perfected earth. Many ridicule this as creating two
>"classes" but that is not how we see it, it is simply about
>different rewards, the ones who live eternally on earth will
>exist in the condition that God originally made us to have,
>we will probably have close contact with him and his Son
>just as Adam did before he sinned.
>
>I hope that wasn't too confusing.


Corvus,
I'm pretty sure I'm following you. Concerning the giving of perfect eternal life on a perfected earth, what is the basis upon which God gives this? What does he have in view concerning each person that moves him to give them everlasting life? I have done some reading about it in the Watchtower literature and am trying to verify that I've properly understood it. Are you willing to give it a try? No need to be exhaustive. I don't expect anything of the sort. I'm thinking along the lines of: Is it something the person has/does/is or is God's consideration based on something outside/external to the person? Can you recall this being discussed ever? If you're not following the question then there is the chance that I'm not using the right vocabulary to ask the question. I'm confident that we can connect on this but we might need a couple of jump starts to get the conversation on track.

Thanks again for your previous answers. I appreciate it.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-19-02, 06:25 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #7
 
   G'day Dave,

The ultrasound went well (huge WOW!! factor ), unfortunately the little blighter had its legs crossed so we won't know the sex until it is born - oh well, it'll be a surprise All the bits are in the right places, it is about 16cm long, about half a foot long and is a little acrobat, it moved it's arms constantly throughout the scan. We could see the heard beating like the clappers (136 bpm)

>Corvus,
>I'm pretty sure I'm following you. Concerning the giving of
>perfect eternal life on a perfected earth, what is the basis
>upon which God gives this? What does he have in view
>concerning each person that moves him to give them
>everlasting life? I have done some reading about it in the
>Watchtower literature and am trying to verify that I've
>properly understood it. Are you willing to give it a try?
>No need to be exhaustive. I don't expect anything of the
>sort. I'm thinking along the lines of: Is it something the
>person has/does/is or is God's consideration based on
>something outside/external to the person? Can you recall
>this being discussed ever? If you're not following the
>question then there is the chance that I'm not using the
>right vocabulary to ask the question. I'm confident that we
>can connect on this but we might need a couple of jump
>starts to get the conversation on track.
>

Well technically it is something both without and within a person. The "within" is a living vibrant faith producing works - it is a myth that we base salvation on how many hours of preaching we do or that we have to work for salvation - works are in our words an "outworking of our faith" ie, works are a product of faith and not the other way round, you could be a special pioneer (120 hrs a month) and still be regarded as unworthy by God and conversly you could only preach occasionally and be considered worthy of salvation by him. The "without" is God's selection or "calling" of you to his worship - we are not in favour of predestination but we do believe one becomes a believer because God has seen that your heart condition is right (in his opinion) and called you to him.

Just like Protestants we believe that you cannot earn salvation, no matter whether by good works (Christ's parables and such prove this beyond doubt) however unlike most Protestants (from what I have observed) we also believe that you must show good works. However, these works are not for your salvation, they are for the good of others, especially unbelievers, because by doing good things you may prick another's conscience and move them to search out God and better yet, begin worshipping him. Salvation is based on faith alone, but it must be a living faith because dead faith cannot save you any more than trying to earn salvation by works or tithes or any other means can.

>Thanks again for your previous answers. I appreciate it.
>
>Sincerely,
>Dave

Not a problem, it is a pleasure to have a polite discussion with someone for a change

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
desertfoxmb click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-16-02
94 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Aug-20-02, 08:27 AM (PST)
Click to EMail desertfoxmb Click to send private message to desertfoxmb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #8
 
   >G'day Dave,
>The ultrasound went well (huge WOW!! factor ),
>unfortunately the little blighter had its legs crossed so we
>won't know the sex until it is born - oh well, it'll be a
>surprise All the bits are in the right places, it is
>about 16cm long, about half a foot long and is a little
>acrobat, it moved it's arms constantly throughout the scan.
>We could see the heard beating like the clappers (136
>bpm)

That is great! Congratulations on a healthy (if so far androgenous ) baby.

>Well technically it is something both
>Just like Protestants we believe that you cannot earn
>salvation, no matter whether by good works (Christ's
>parables and such prove this beyond doubt) however unlike
>most Protestants (from what I have observed) we also believe
>that you must show good works. However, these works are not
>for your salvation, they are for the good of others,
>especially unbelievers, because by doing good things you may
>prick another's conscience and move them to search out God
>and better yet, begin worshipping him. Salvation is based on
>faith alone, but it must be a living faith because dead
>faith cannot save you any more than trying to earn salvation
>by works or tithes or any other means can.

I agree with this 100%. What do you consider to be good works that show a faith? Just the door to door preaching work? Jay Dubya addressed me on this before he was banned. Here is my response to him. I would be happy to hear your thoughts/response.

http://www.carmforums.org/dcforum/DCForumID17/689.html#4

>Not a problem, it is a pleasure to have a
>polite discussion with someone for a change

Agreed. Hopefully we can all begin to discuss issues productively.

In Christ,
Fred


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-21-02, 05:25 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #9
 
   G'day desertfox

>That is great! Congratulations on a healthy (if so far
>androgenous ) baby.
>

Thanks for that.

>I agree with this 100%. What do you consider to be good
>works that show a faith? Just the door to door preaching
>work? Jay Dubya addressed me on this before he was banned.
>Here is my response to him. I would be happy to hear your
>thoughts/response.
>
>http://www.carmforums.org/dcforum/DCForumID17/689.html#4
>

I would agree with what you wrote as being "good works" and we do do all those things, just not all as "official" things. For example you mentioned getting together to help the elderly person who isn't of your faith is something that Witnesses do frequently, but it is not organised by the Society, it is up to individuals and congregations how they help others. I give to several secular charities as do many others in my congregation. Though I must stress the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society is not set up as a charity in the vein of say St Vincent De Paul's, they are a Bible Society like the United Bible Societies and the Society for the Propagation of Hebrew Scriptures. Their stated purpose is to provide Bibles and Bible commentaries not run hospitals and outreach programmes. As for Jehovah's Witnesses our purpose is to raise awarenes of the Bible and to call people to read it, again we are not a charity like those I mentioned. Though as I said this does not prevent individuals and congregations from helping out when they are asked or reaching out a helping hand for someone who needs it.

While our primary goal is to preach the Good News, this is not the only thing we do and it is not the only "good work" that we do, we just don't make a big issue of giving other help.

And to those cynics who think we are "trumpeting" our works when a pioneer or the like is bought up in front of the congregation this is not so. The whole reason for it is to encourage others, in many cases these people have overcome cripling illnesses and other difficulties to devote their service to God, not the Society, God, full time - their stories are an encouragement to others who may be facing similar troubles.

>Agreed. Hopefully we can all begin to discuss issues
>productively.

It is my hope.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
desertfoxmb click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-16-02
94 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Aug-22-02, 03:36 AM (PST)
Click to EMail desertfoxmb Click to send private message to desertfoxmb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #10
 
   >>That is great! Congratulations on a healthy (if so far
>>androgenous ) baby.

>Thanks for that.

I've always liked babies and children. I used to be one once..

>I would agree with what you wrote as being
>"good works" and we do do all those things, just not all as
>"official" things. For example you mentioned getting
>together to help the elderly person who isn't of your faith
>is something that Witnesses do frequently, but it is not
>organised by the Society, it is up to individuals and
>congregations how they help others. I give to several
>secular charities as do many others in my congregation.
>Though I must stress the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society
>is not set up as a charity in the vein of say St Vincent De
>Paul's, they are a Bible Society like the United Bible
>Societies and the Society for the Propagation of Hebrew
>Scriptures. Their stated purpose is to provide Bibles and
>Bible commentaries not run hospitals and outreach
>programmes. As for Jehovah's Witnesses our purpose is to
>raise awarenes of the Bible and to call people to read it,
>again we are not a charity like those I mentioned. Though as
>I said this does not prevent individuals and congregations
>from helping out when they are asked or reaching out a
>helping hand for someone who needs it.

I must say then that one of three things are true. The congregation you attend is exceptional in nature, the WTS in Australia operates differently than in the states or the congregations that I attended when I was younger were simply sub-par. (I went to three different ones as well as many assemblies and conventions) My experience of the attitude at those was in fact generally loving, for other wirnesses. There was not (to the best of my knowledge) any other show of good works mentioned or alluded to other than attending meetings and going out door to door. I pray that it was the last of the three items I mentioned that is true. And if that is the case I pray that those congregations find love for others that goes beyond going door to door.

Now that aside, I watched one of the latest videos from the society at my grandmothers house recently. It was about the worldwide brotherhood (I can't remember the name). The big earthquake in Kobe, Japan was mentioned and it was specifically stated that the society helped the witnesses first. Why would that be? To my way of thinking those who were not witnesses, who the WT were not convinced had their faith in the right place would be the ones that needed the most direct attention. At the very least I don't understand why there would be any differentiation at all between witness and non-witness in a situation like that. I know you don't like this stuff but, what would Jesus do?


>And to those cynics who think we are "trumpeting" our works
>when a pioneer or the like is bought up in front of the
>congregation this is not so. The whole reason for it is to
>encourage others, in many cases these people have overcome
>cripling illnesses and other difficulties to devote their
>service to God, not the Society, God, full time - their
>stories are an encouragement to others who may be facing
>similar troubles.

I have never had a problem with that. Someone doing what pioneers do would be analagous to a missionary. However, I do disagree with putting a focus on hours of service. That at the very least gives the _appearance_ of focusing on quantity not quality. I prefer to witness to people whereever I happen to be. I have two impromptu 'studies' going on right now with people at work. One with a very mixed up young college senior, one with a man formerly from communist Russia who was never taught about God and His love. Jesus did send his disciples out into the field, but He didn't give them a tally sheet. The society places too much emphasis on the hours (just like many denominations put too much emphasis on number of salvations) in my opinion. It takes away from the faith involved. Witnesses have explained it to me that if they didn't do it it wouldn't get done. I totally disagree with that. Where does faith in God come into that picture? But that is another discusssion.


In Christ,
Fred


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
msgoftruth click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-28-02
196 posts, 3 feedbacks, 6 points
Aug-21-02, 06:17 PM (PST)
Click to EMail msgoftruth Click to send private message to msgoftruth Click to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
11. "Life - for Corvus"
In response to message #8
 
   The ultrasound went well (huge WOW!! factor ), unfortunately the little blighter had its legs crossed so we won't know the sex until it is born - oh well, it'll be a surprise All the bits are in the right places, it is about 16cm long, about half a foot long and is a little acrobat, it moved it's arms constantly throughout the scan. We could see the heard beating like the clappers (136 bpm)

Hi Corvus! This is wonderful news! It's amazing isn't it? I can't believe with all this technology that some still believe that a "fetus" isn't a baby. I just love the bumper sticker that says, "If it isn't a baby then you aren't pregnant!"

I just wanted to say congratulations. Please keep us updated!

msgoftruth


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-21-02, 07:50 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Life - for Corvus"
In response to message #11
 
   G'day msg ol' friend

>Hi Corvus! This is wonderful news! It's amazing isn't it?
>I can't believe with all this technology that some still
>believe that a "fetus" isn't a baby. I just love the bumper
>sticker that says, "If it isn't a baby then you aren't
>pregnant!"
>

How true, as far as I am concerned life starts the moment the egg is fertilized, no negotiation. If the baby dies, it should only be of natural causes, never because we have decided we don't want it, for any reason.

I think this was doubly reinforced to me when I saw that baby's heart beating on the monitor (136 beats/min) and its little arms moving away, on one of the scans it almost looks like it is waving . Truly, God is great.

>I just wanted to say congratulations. Please keep us
>updated!
>
>msgoftruth

Thank you my friend, though my wife is doing all the hard work

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
msgoftruth click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-28-02
196 posts, 3 feedbacks, 6 points
Aug-22-02, 06:12 AM (PST)
Click to EMail msgoftruth Click to send private message to msgoftruth Click to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
15. "RE: Life - for Corvus"
In response to message #12
 
   >G'day msg ol' friend
G'day to you too, Corvus,
>
>How true, as far as I am concerned life
>starts the moment the egg is fertilized, no negotiation. If
>the baby dies, it should only be of natural causes, never
>because we have decided we don't want it, for any reason.
>
>I think this was doubly reinforced to me when I saw that
>baby's heart beating on the monitor (136 beats/min) and its
>little arms moving away, on one of the scans it almost looks
>like it is waving . Truly, God is great.

I couldn't agree with you more.

>Thank you my friend, though my wife is
>doing all the hard work

You are welcome. I didn't consider it hard work, but a joy! And I am sure that your wife feels the same. I actually loved everyone of my pregnancies. And men cannot possibly know the feelings that overcome you when you first feel your baby move.

Take care my friend and tell your wife to take care also.

msgoftruth


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-22-02, 02:35 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: Life - for Corvus"
In response to message #15
 
   >I couldn't agree with you more.
>
>>Thank you my friend, though my wife is
>>doing all the hard work

>
>You are welcome. I didn't consider it hard work, but a joy!
> And I am sure that your wife feels the same. I actually
>loved everyone of my pregnancies. And men cannot possibly
>know the feelings that overcome you when you first feel your
>baby move.
>

So does Mel, she literally glows when the baby moves. I think we get a small taste of it when we feel our child moving through our wife's belly - it is a wonderful thing.

>Take care my friend and tell your wife to take care also.
>
>msgoftruth

I will, though she is already doing a great job, eating plenty of fruit and veggies, she has gone off coffee (even the smell of it makes her feel ill) she drinks decaff tea and caffeinated tea only rarely, she hasn't touched alcohol since she worked out she was pregnant.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-22-02, 04:59 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #8
 
   Corvus,
I haven't lost interest in the thread. I do have some specific questions in mind. I have tomorrow afternoon off so I'll try to get them put together then.

Take Care,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-22-02, 02:37 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "No worries Dave nt."
In response to message #14
 
   .

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-24-02, 08:14 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #8
 
  
>
>>Corvus,
>>I'm pretty sure I'm following you. Concerning the giving of
>>perfect eternal life on a perfected earth, what is the basis
>>upon which God gives this? What does he have in view
>>concerning each person that moves him to give them
>>everlasting life? I have done some reading about it in the
>>Watchtower literature and am trying to verify that I've
>>properly understood it. Are you willing to give it a try?
>>No need to be exhaustive. I don't expect anything of the
>>sort. I'm thinking along the lines of: Is it something the
>>person has/does/is or is God's consideration based on
>>something outside/external to the person? Can you recall
>>this being discussed ever? If you're not following the
>>question then there is the chance that I'm not using the
>>right vocabulary to ask the question. I'm confident that we
>>can connect on this but we might need a couple of jump
>>starts to get the conversation on track.
>>
>
>Well technically it is something both
>without and within a person. The "within" is a living
>vibrant faith producing works - it is a myth that we base
>salvation on how many hours of preaching we do or that we
>have to work for salvation - works are in our words an
>"outworking of our faith" ie, works are a product of faith
>and not the other way round, you could be a special pioneer
>(120 hrs a month) and still be regarded as unworthy by God
>and conversly you could only preach occasionally and be
>considered worthy of salvation by him. The "without" is
>God's selection or "calling" of you to his worship - we are
>not in favour of predestination but we do believe one
>becomes a believer because God has seen that your heart
>condition is right (in his opinion) and called you to him.
>
>Just like Protestants we believe that you cannot earn
>salvation, no matter whether by good works (Christ's
>parables and such prove this beyond doubt) however unlike
>most Protestants (from what I have observed) we also believe
>that you must show good works. However, these works are not
>for your salvation, they are for the good of others,
>especially unbelievers, because by doing good things you may
>prick another's conscience and move them to search out God
>and better yet, begin worshipping him. Salvation is based on
>faith alone, but it must be a living faith because dead
>faith cannot save you any more than trying to earn salvation
>by works or tithes or any other means can.


Corvus,
Here's where we're going to have to dig in our heels and get into more detail. I'm going to revisit my question about "what does God have in view when he grants eternal life, what moves him to give it". When I read your answer above, it seems like we're talking about two different events. Are you saying that when God gives you everlasting life (yes, I know that we may disagree about when that happens, but I'm asking about your viewpoint), He is looking at two things. He is going to give you everlasting life due to two considerations: (1)you possess a living vibrant faith, and (2)His calling of you?

If those two things are present, then God will (to use a term that hopefully won't trip up the conversation) save you? If that is the case, then would you be comfortable with describing it as salvation by faith? (Yes, I know... not faith that is alone... it must produce good works...). But if it is that kind of living faith, then it could be described as salvation by faith, right? As long as we are both clear on what you mean, is that what it is? Because I don't detect that you've identified anything else being yours as the basis for God's favorable judgement. You said it was faith (qualified as you did) and His calling.

Are those the criteria which God uses to determine if you will receive everlasting life? Have I understood your thinking accurately on this? In my reading, I think the Watchtower identifies something else as the criterion for receiving everlasting life. That's why I'm belaboring the point by asking you in so many different ways. I'm trying to ensure that we're not miscommunicating.

Remember, I'm talking about the final point of judgement where God is actually giving everlasting life. I'm not thinking about what leads up to it, but the final judgement, the last one, where you receive either one thing or another.

Some may not believe it by I do try my best at accurately understanding others and representing their views accurately.

Corvus, if you are comfortable with continuing the discussion I'll wait to hear back from you.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-26-02, 07:20 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "Bump - nt"
In response to message #18
 
   .


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Aug-26-02, 05:29 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #18
 
   G'day Dave,

>Corvus,
>Here's where we're going to have to dig in our heels and get
>into more detail. I'm going to revisit my question about
>"what does God have in view when he grants eternal life,
>what moves him to give it". When I read your answer above,
>it seems like we're talking about two different events. Are
>you saying that when God gives you everlasting life (yes, I
>know that we may disagree about when that happens, but I'm
>asking about your viewpoint), He is looking at two things.
>He is going to give you everlasting life due to two
>considerations: (1)you possess a living vibrant faith, and
>(2)His calling of you?
>

That would be about right, though I would probably put the last bit in reverse 1) he looks at your heart, sees one who would worship him then he calls you to him and opens your eyes and your heart to know him 2) He gives you faith that you continue to build on.

>If those two things are present, then God will (to use a
>term that hopefully won't trip up the conversation) save
>you? If that is the case, then would you be comfortable
>with describing it as salvation by faith? (Yes, I know...
>not faith that is alone... it must produce good works...).
>But if it is that kind of living faith, then it could be
>described as salvation by faith, right? As long as we are
>both clear on what you mean, is that what it is? Because I
>don't detect that you've identified anything else being
>yours as the basis for God's favorable judgement. You said
>it was faith (qualified as you did) and His calling.
>

Yes, that would be correct again, faith is what saves.

>Are those the criteria which God uses to determine if you
>will receive everlasting life? Have I understood your
>thinking accurately on this? In my reading, I think the
>Watchtower identifies something else as the criterion for
>receiving everlasting life. That's why I'm belaboring the
>point by asking you in so many different ways. I'm trying
>to ensure that we're not miscommunicating.
>

I think what it all boils down to is that there are many things that are expressions of a saving faith, a true faith, but when push comes to shove it is the faith and that saves not the other things.

>Remember, I'm talking about the final point of judgement
>where God is actually giving everlasting life. I'm not
>thinking about what leads up to it, but the final judgement,
>the last one, where you receive either one thing or another.
>

Understood.

>Some may not believe it by I do try my best at accurately
>understanding others and representing their views
>accurately.
>

As do I.

>Corvus, if you are comfortable with continuing the
>discussion I'll wait to hear back from you.
>
>Sincerely,
>Dave

I would be very happy to continue this discussion.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-27-02, 10:06 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: Everlasting Life - ? for Corvus"
In response to message #20
 
   Corvus,
Thank you for the reply. I hope to put my post together either tonight or tomorrow. But be warned, it's probably going to be lengthy. Not for the purpose of snowing you under a bunch of material. Rather, it will be to share with you the mix of teaching that I've come across and show that it isn't some odd conclusion pulled out of one or two obscure publications.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Aug-28-02, 04:17 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "Stuck in a meeting"
In response to message #20
 
   Corvus,
I'm stuck in meetings until the weekend and have previous commitments in the evenings. I'll put something together when the opportunity arises but it'll probably be a little while. It depends on whether I get a lunch hour today or tomorrow.

Take Care,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Sep-01-02, 09:00 PM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "Post Postponed until Labor Day"
In response to message #22
 
   Corvus,
I have the bulk of my post prepared. It needs one more run through and then I'll put it up. That will happen on Monday, probably in the morning.

Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
searcher
Member since Mar-18-02
70 posts, Rate this user
Sep-02-02, 07:35 AM (PST)
Click to EMail searcher Click to send private message to searcher Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
24. "Corvus, how have you been mate? I posted..."
In response to message #20
 
   ...at TS asking how the ultrasound went but I didn't hear back from you. So, how did it go? I hope all is well with you and yours. Oh, by the way our conversation is still waiting for you over at TS, no hurry I will bump it when necessary. Blessings!

Grace and peace
in His name, Searcher.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-02-02, 02:01 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
26. "G'day Searcher"
In response to message #24
 
   Thanks mate,

I shall start putting together a reply ASAP

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
searcher
Member since Mar-18-02
70 posts, Rate this user
Sep-03-02, 06:35 AM (PST)
Click to EMail searcher Click to send private message to searcher Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
34. "Thanks Corvus, how is the impending arrival? I know..."
In response to message #26
 
   ...you had said your wife was going in for an ultrasound on the 18th of August. I hope all is well. Blessings!

Grace and peace
in His name, Searcher.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Sep-02-02, 09:06 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
25. "Salvation by Faith or by Works - ? for Corvus - Long Post"
In response to message #20
 
   LAST EDITED ON Sep-02-02 AT 09:08 AM (PST)
 
Corvus,
I have enjoyed our discussion so far. I'll briefly summarize where I think we are at and then will move into the extended detail that I would like to explore with you. In earlier discussions we were talking about how God decides who receives everlasting life. Our discussion was focused on the great crowd, since that is what the vast majority of Jehovah's Witnesses are, including yourself. You answered that God will have two criteria in view when judging the great crowd in order to bestow everlasting life or judgment on them. You said that it was:

1) His knowing that your heart is rightly disposed towards him, thus his choosing of you. (You could call this his election of you.)
2) Your faith in him (further being defined as an active faith).

You made clear that the works your faith produces are not the grounds of God's judging in a strict sense, but are simply the fruit of a real and living faith. In seeing the criteria you have identified, I see only one thing coming from you in the equation. Namely faith. So in the strict sense, your salvation (your final salvation when you will receive everlasting life - not the events leading up to that point) could be described as "salvation by faith". At least that's what I understand to be your own personal position.

I have heard time and time again that Jehovah's Witnesses are justified by their works. Many Jehovah's Witnesses, (and I'm guessing this includes you) object to that characterization, saying that it is a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of your belief. Because of the exchanges that I've read in the past on this subject, and my own special interest in the question of how we have peace with God, I've done some extended research into this. My own interest is fueled by the great theological battles waged during the reformation about this question.

Let me make clear that this post will focus primarily on the final salvation of the great crowd. We can discuss the salvation of the remnant at a later time if you so desire. I'm focusing on the great crowd because it has more direct applicability to most people. The remnant is, you might say, the exception to the rule and thus (in this discussion) a side issue. While I have researched both groups and think I have a fair grasp of both, for the sake of this post I'll limit my comments to the great crowd.

I'm going to include several quotes from original source material so you can check out my research. I apologize for the length of this post, but I felt it was necessary to prove that I'm not some crackpot that is drawing illegitimate conclusions from a small sampling of Watchtower literature. What I've found in my search is that the Watchtower organization does, in fact, speak directly to the question of the basis of God's final judgment on the great crowd. The tip of the spear lies in the answer to the question, "What is that basis of judgment which God uses to give everlasting life? Is it faith, works, or something else?"

Let's start with a 1985 article from the Watchtower. The reference provided is for the larger article, but I'll only quote a specific portion of it. (I take this approach in most of the quotes provided in this post.)


--------Beginning of quote
*** w85 12/1 13-18 Declared Righteous as a Friend of God ***

Brought Up to Perfection
16 The "great crowd," who survive the "great tribulation," are not already declared righteous for life. We can see this from the fact that the chapter that mentions them goes on to say: "The Lamb, who is in the midst of the throne, will shepherd them, and will guide them to fountains of waters of life." (Revelation 7:17) So, even though God previously counted them as righteous compared to mankind in general and as his friends, they need additional help, or steps to be taken, so that they can be declared righteous for life.
17 During the Millennium, the enthroned Lamb, Christ Jesus, together with his 144,000 associate kings and priests, will apply a program of spiritual and physical "curing of the nations." (Revelation 22:1, 2) Such "nations" will be made up of the survivors of the great tribulation, any children born to them after Har-Magedon, and those who come back in the "resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous." (Acts 24:15) All who put faith in Christ's blood and accomplish appropriate "deeds" will eventually have their names written in "the book of life."-Revelation 20:11-15.
18 By the end of Christ's Millennial Reign, those of earth's inhabitants who have shown that they accept Christ's ransom and will live by Jehovah's standards will have been raised to perfection. (Revelation 20:5) They will be as Adam was before he sinned. Like him, they will be tested as to their obedience.
"Glorious Freedom" as "Children of God"
19 Immediately after the Millennium, Christ will hand over to his Father a perfect human race. (1 Corinthians 15:28) "Satan will be let loose" for a decisive test of mankind. (Revelation 20:7, 8) The names of any who fail under test will not be "found written in the book of life." They will symbolically be "hurled into the lake of fire," which "means the second death."-Revelation 20:15; 21:8.
20 Those who prove loyal to Jehovah will have their names indelibly written in the "book of life," as being perfect in integrity and worthy of the right to everlasting life on earth. Jehovah himself will then declare them righteous in the complete sense. (Romans 8:33) They will have been justified to life eternal. God will adopt them as his earthly sons, and they will enter into the promised "glorious freedom of the children of God." (Romans 8:20, 21) Peace and harmony will have been restored to the universe. Reconciliation with God will be complete for "things upon the earth" and "things in the heavens." (Colossians 1:20) Jehovah's merciful arrangement of justification will have served its purpose. To the question, "Are you right with God?" every creature in heaven and on earth will be able to answer yes and add: "To the One sitting on the throne and to the Lamb be the blessing and the honor and the glory and the might forever and ever."-Revelation 5:13.


By faith in "the blood of the Lamb," the "other sheep" are given an approved standing before Jehovah and are thus declared righteous for friendship with him and for survival during the "great tribulation." They will attain to perfection by the end of the Millennium. After the final test they will be declared righteous for life.
---------End of quote

Corvus,
There is quite a bit more in the entire article. A couple of things caught my eye here. First, the great crowd will not receive everlasting life until after the Millennium. Although we haven't discussed it in much detail, I'm pretty sure that is your position as well based on previous comments you made at the beginning of the thread. Second, there is mentioned a test at the end of the Millennium. A test. As you see in paragraph 20 above, "Those who prove loyal to Jehovah will have their names indelibly written in the 'book of life,' as being perfect in integrity and worthy of the right to everlasting life on earth." That does not sound like salvation by faith. It is the language of merit that the Watchtower is using here. I'll be honest here. When I read this, the first thought that pops into my mind is not that the Watchtower says you will be saved by faith. To the contrary, when I see things like "the final test", "those who prove loyal", and "worthy of the right to everlasting life", I come to other conclusions about what the Watchtower is trying to say. The Watchtower has said much more about this. Let's take a look at it together. This quote is an extended one because the pertinent pieces I want to see are at the beginning and end of it.


----------------Beginning of quote
*** w69 3/15 180-3 Declared Righteous ***
Declared Righteous
DECLARED righteous! How? Can such a thing be possible, when all of Adam's descendants, every one of them, have been unrighteous, imperfect and with a tendency toward wrongdoing? If honest, each one of us must frankly admit as did the psalmist David: "With error I was brought forth with birth pains, and in sin my mother conceived me."-Ps. 51:5.
According to the Bible, "sin" and "unrighteousness" are synonymous. (1 John 5:17) Thus the inheritance of sin from our first human parents on down to this day has labeled us all "unrighteous." And the undeniable evidence of this inherent sinfulness or unrighteousness is the fact that men continue to die. (Rom. 5:12; 6:23) Further, they are unable to relieve themselves of this fatal disability, for the psalmist again writes, under inspiration: "Not one of them can by any means redeem even a brother, nor give to God a ransom for him."-Ps. 49:7.
Yet the Bible shows that the unrighteous can be declared righteous! How is this possible? On what basis can there be a declaring of imperfect creatures righteous? Can Jehovah God, the great Judge, do this and still remain righteous himself?
THROUGH JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD
Let us take note of God's "means of saving" sinful humans from the death-dealing effects of inherited sin. (Luke 2:30) He sent forth his Son, born of a woman, it is true, but not tainted with the imperfect reproductive seed of Adam, for "holy spirit" and "power of the Most High" impregnated Mary with perfect seed. (Luke 1:35) Therefore the one born of her came to be "undefiled, separated from the sinners." (Heb. 7:26) When he was grown to manhood he qualified as having that 'body prepared by God' for sacrifice on behalf of unrighteous men.-Heb. 10:5.
At the time of his baptism in the Jordan, Jesus was a perfect, righteous man. He presented himself willingly to enter upon a sacrificial course marked out for him by his heavenly Father. As he came up out of the water God's holy spirit came upon him, and by marvelous signs God acknowledged him to be his Son-not in the sense that he was God's human Son at the time of his birth, but now in the sense that he was "born again," "born from the spirit." (John 3:3-6) Thereafter Jesus was on his way back to the heavenly life he had enjoyed prior to his being sent forth to the earth.
Actually perfect in his human organism, Jesus held on to that perfection by reason of his integrity maintained under brutal test. "He learned obedience from the things he suffered," that is, he continued obedient to God even when openly exposed to hateful persecution by Satan and his agents. (Heb. 5:7-9) So God made the Chief Agent of salvation "perfect through sufferings." (Heb. 2:10) Not one flaw showed up. Jesus stood firmly righteous before God on his own merit-the only human ever to do so.
Those sufferings culminated in Jesus' shameful but undeserved death on the torture stake. Thereafter God raised him out of death, enabling Jesus to resume life as a spirit creature and to go his way back to heaven, there to present the merit of his sacrifice as an offering in behalf of sinful humankind. This act of God, resurrecting Jesus to life in the spirit, constituted a 'declaring of Jesus righteous in the spirit.' (1 Tim. 3:16; 1 Pet. 3:18) It was, in effect, a declaration by the heavenly Father that, despite all the contrary appearances, this Son who had undergone slander, reproaches and a cruel death, had fully accomplished the Father's will. That sacrificial death of the Son provided the basis for God to declare righteous those who would exercise faith in Christ. (Gal. 2:16) His willingly going into death would serve to cancel out the condemnation of death that had come upon the human family through Adam's disobedience.
THE CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION
However, God purposed to select a limited number from among humankind and adopt them into his family of spiritual sons, forming "the congregation of the first-born who have been enrolled in the heavens"-a congregation organized under its Head, Christ Jesus. (Heb. 12:23) Theirs is the prospect of life in the heavens as spirit creatures. But first they must prove faithful until death in a service that God assigns them while they are still alive in the flesh. That service is of a priestly nature-the ministry of reconciliation, whereby they must seek to aid men to get reconciled to God.-2 Cor. 5:18, 19.
In order to qualify these ministers of reconciliation for their service, and that they might be "born from the spirit," becoming sons of God, they must first have a right standing before God in the flesh, even as did Jesus when he presented himself for baptism. How could they attain this? Only by God's applying the merit of Jesus' sacrifice in their behalf immediately, forgiving them all their sins, and, by judicial act on his part in imputing human perfection to them, declaring them righteous. And, of course, God takes this action only with respect to those whom he calls to be members of "the congregation of the first-born" and who demonstrate faith in the ransom sacrifice of Christ Jesus. As the apostle Paul explains it: "It is as a free gift that they are being declared righteous by undeserved kindness through the release by the ransom paid by Christ Jesus."-Rom. 3:24.
Keep in mind that these are declared righteous in the flesh in order that they might be in line for adoption into the family of God's spirit sons in heaven. Their being declared righteous does not result in actual fleshly perfection, but they are accounted by God as being perfect humans; the righteousness is imputed to them. Thus God makes them acceptable for sacrifice to himself. So God now makes them his spiritual sons. As such, they must serve him, even to the extent of yielding up human life and all future prospects of life as humans. In a very real sense they follow closely in the steps of their Leader, Christ Jesus.-1 Pet. 2:21.
We have seen that after his loyal course even until death in the flesh Jesus Christ was "made alive in the spirit," "declared righteous in spirit," given immortality and incorruption. (1 Pet. 3:18; 1 Tim. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:42, 45) In the same way his spirit-begotten followers who prove themselves loyal until death are "declared righteous in spirit" by being resurrected as spirit creatures, and they, too, are made sharers in the divine nature. (2 Pet. 1:4) Then their righteousness is no longer an imputed righteousness, a righteousness derived from someone else's merit, but it is actual. (1 John 3:2) They are rewarded with incorruption, immortality.
"RIGHTEOUSNESS" IN PRE-CHRISTIAN TIMES
But what about those humans who worshiped God and were inclined toward righteousness in pre-Christian times? How did God view them? They were tainted with inherited sin. Adam had lost righteousness for himself and his offspring, and the time was still in the future when Christ Jesus would "shed light upon life and incorruption through the good news." (2 Tim. 1:10) How, then, could the holy God have dealings with those pre-Christian worshipers? Because of their faith.
It was because of their faith in God's promises, which faith was manifested by works, that men and women such as Abraham and Rahab were 'counted righteous' by God. (Rom. 4:3; Jas. 2:25) They were not given over to wickedness like the worldly people around them. They "walked with the true God," even as did Noah and many others. (Gen. 6:9) They were not, however, in line for adoption as prospective spirit sons of God. They looked forward to the time when God by resurrection would restore them to life on earth. God could and did deal with them and bless them because of their faith in his word of promise.
"RIGHTEOUSNESS" OF MODERN "GREAT CROWD"
Today there is "a great crowd, which no man able to number," of God's worshipers on earth, in addition to the remaining ones of the 144,000 who are called to the heavens. In vision the apostle John beheld them and heard them described as those who "have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." (Rev. 7:4, 9-17) They take positive action toward demonstrating their faith in the shed blood of Christ Jesus, the Lamb of God. They are spoken of prophetically by Christ Jesus as "the righteous ones," because God also counts their faith to them for righteousness.-Matt. 25:37.
But that "great crowd" of Revelation, chapter 7, are not at this time declared righteous with a view to being accepted as God's sons. Rather, the white robes in their case represent a temporary standing before God-one that will tide them safely through Armageddon's judgment execution upon a wicked world and bring them into Christ's thousand-year reign of peace. Under that new system of things they will be trained in righteousness and uplifted toward perfection in the flesh. Under that peaceful reign, too, multitudes will be restored to life on earth from their graves, including the loyal, pre-Christian worshipers of Jehovah God. But will any of such ever be declared righteous?
Yes, but that acceptance of them by Jehovah as his human sons, as part of his universal family, must await the close of the thousand-year reign of Christ. By that time Christ Jesus through his heavenly government will have uplifted obedient humankind to fleshly perfection, to the condition of human perfection enjoyed by Adam at the time God applied the test of obedience to him. Then is the time when Christ "hands over the kingdom to his God and Father" and when the Father determines who are worthy of living forever in happiness on earth. (1 Cor. 15:24-26) That determination, as in Adam's case, will also be made on the basis of a test-a test that is referred to in the words written at Revelation 20:7-10.
Those then holding fast to the clean worship of Jehovah will be "declared righteous." They will actually receive "the glorious freedom of the children of God," earthly children. They will be declared righteous, not in the spirit, but in the flesh. They will then have, not an imputed righteousness, but actual human perfection and the prospect of living everlastingly on earth under God's fatherly protection.-Rom. 8:18-21; Rev. 21:3, 4.
----------------End of quote


I told you that the Watchtower had spoken directly about the topic of our discussion. You saw above, "On what basis can there be a declaring of imperfect creatures righteous?" Within this extended quote were a couple of highlights that I wanted to bring to your attention. First, the description of the basis for Christ's righteousness. " Jesus stood firmly righteous before God on his own merit-the only human ever to do so." I see the Watchtower understanding the concept of true personal merit in the person of Jesus. That's very important and I'm glad to see them acknowledge it. However, I don't see the Watchtower ruling out the possibility of anyone in the future ever standing righteous before God based on their own merit. Instead, I see them saying that he is the only one so far to do so. The Watchtower doesn't leave us in suspense on the answer to that question. In the question of anyone ever standing righteous before God on their own merit, as you can see at the end of the quote some things are said about the great crowd that echo the earlier quote. A final test is mentioned and the language of merit is used repeatedly. You will not be accepted as a son of God and receive everlasting life until you pass this test. When I hear things like that, once again, my mind doesn't hear that as "salvation by faith". Furthermore, we see this article going into even more explicit language than the previous quote when it says, " They will be declared righteous, not in the spirit, but in the flesh. They will then have, not an imputed righteousness, but actual human perfection and the prospect of living everlastingly on earth under God's fatherly protection." Does this sound like faith, and not works, to you? It doesn't to me. When I see the theologically loaded language of "imputed righteousness", I conclude that the author of the article was at least somewhat familiar with the battles during the Reformation about salvation. It speaks to me directly as a lay-student of the Reformation and makes a definite impression on me. They draw a distinction between imputed righteousness (the righteousness of another counted to my account) and actual human perfection. I can see salvation by faith in the concept of imputed righteousness. I cannot see salvation by faith in the concept of human perfection and passing a test and the Father using that test as the basis for determining those "who are worthy of living forever in happiness on earth." As before, this is the language of merit and works and not the language of faith.

Corvus, just to clarify to make sure that we're not misconnecting. I understand that the works the Watchtower is referring to here is not the works that you do today. Rather, it is referring to you passing the final test at the end of the Millennium, after you have been raised to human perfection. Nonetheless, I have to return to a question I mentioned earlier. Does the Watchtower teach salvation by faith, by works, or by something else? Based on these samples of Watchtower material, this is a description of salvation by works (namely your passing of the test at the end of the Millennium and not on any other basis). It is not a salvation by faith (remember I'm talking about your final salvation, not the things leading up to it).

-------------Beginning of quote
*** w65 3/15 177-82 Earthly Opportunity Opened Up by Resurrection ***
19 At the close of this thousand years of kingly and priestly aid comes the loosing of Satan and his demons from the abyss, to test all these perfected inhabitants of the earthly Paradise. By their conduct under this final, deciding test, the determination will be made of the two classes, (a) those who deserve everlasting destruction in "second death," and (b) those who are worthy of the guaranteed gift of everlasting life in the Paradise earth. In this manner those then under test will themselves prove whether theirs has been a "resurrection of life" or a "resurrection of judgment" (condemnatory judgment).-John 5:28, 29.
-------------End of quote


Again we have the description of the basis for salvation for the great crowd. (I'm using "great crowd" generally of those who are not the remnant. If that's a stumbling block to the discussion, I am certain that we can find another term to describe the group.) Their conduct during the test is seen as the determining factor of their destiny. This does not sound like salvation by faith. When the Watchtower says things this way, I come to a conclusion based on reading all of these things together. Do you think I'm hearing "salvation by faith" in these? The point that seems to be consistently made by the Watchtower is that Adam did not pass the test of integrity originally, and that this test at the end of the millennium is parallel to that original test. Was that original test a test of faith or of works? It was a test of works, being a test of obedience. And if the test at the end of the millennium is the same kind of test (and I think the Watchtower builds the case that it is), it is a test of obedience also. I'm sorry Corvus, but that's not salvation by faith as we've been discussing.


--------Beginning of quote
*** w65 7/15 447-8 Questions from Readers ***
Questions from Readers
• If resurrected ones are to be judged on the basis of their actions after being raised from the dead, why did Jesus use the past tense in discussing this matter at John 5:28, 29?-H.M., Papua, New Guinea.
Those verses ŽJoh 5:28, 29 Üread: "Do not marvel at this, because the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment."
Jesus apparently stated the matter as he did because it would in this way cover the circumstances of "all those in the memorial tombs."
Those who gain heavenly life with Christ are judged on the basis of the works they do in this life. (2 Cor. 5:10) At the time they are resurrected to spirit life they are granted immortality. (1 Cor. 15:53; Rom. 6:5) They are not then placed on judgment, but are themselves empowered to act as judges with Christ. (Rev. 20:4) Theirs is a "resurrection of life," and the "good things" referred to in their case are those they did before they died.
But what about "those in the memorial tombs" who are resurrected as humans on earth? Will it be determined immediately after their resurrection that theirs is a "resurrection of life" or a "resurrection of judgment"? (Compare John 5:24 with ŽJoh 5 Üverse 29.) What good purpose would be served by raising from the dead millions of persons whose former lives were filled with vile deeds, only to tell them that they are vile and then execute them? The indication of the Scriptures is that when Ha'des gives up those dead in it, they will be 'judged individually according to the deeds' they do following their resurrection. (Rev. 20:13) The resurrection will afford them an opportunity to live.
As the apostle Paul wrote in Hebrews 9:27, 28, "it is reserved for men to die once for all time" due to Adamic sin, "but after this a judgment" that is made possible by the ransom sacrifice of Jesus Christ and that affords men the opportunity for "salvation." Those who formerly did good things will no doubt find it easier to continue in that course, and, if they keep on doing good right on through the final test following Christ's thousand-year rule, it will be shown that theirs was a "resurrection of life." Those who formerly did vile things will be granted the opportunity to change their ways and gain salvation, but in the case of those who do not do so, it will become evident, at the time of that final test at the latest, that theirs was a 'resurrection of condemnatory judgment.'
Now, what if Jesus had phrased his statement differently, saying very plainly that the deeds on which individuals would be judged would all be those performed after their resurrection? Had he done this, he would have been leaving out those who would gain heavenly life with him. Instead, by using an elliptical expression, he included "all those in the memorial tombs." After first referring to the resurrection as one general accomplishment, he apparently cuts through all the in-between details, takes a future viewpoint of the matter when one's past during the millennium must be judicially reviewed, and states the situation as it will exist at the time of the giving of final reward to those who are raised, namely, "those who did good things to a resurrection of life, those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment."
---------End of quote


Once again we have the discussion of maintaining integrity through the test at the end of the millennium and of their acts as the basis of judgment. Corvus, how can I come to the conclusion that the Watchtower teaches that you are saved by faith when the point is repeatedly made that the basis of God's judgment at the end of the millennium will be a final test? I can't. There is a conclusion that I'm seeing but it isn't salvation by faith.


--------------Beginning of quote
*** w58 2/15 127 Questions from Readers ***
Questions from Readers
• On page 84 of the book You May Survive Armageddon into God's New World we read: "The worship of Jehovah was not made impossible by the destroying of earthly Jerusalem's temple. His pure worship with spirit and truth continued on in his spiritual temple that was being built by the antitypical Solomon, Jesus Christ. That spiritual temple survived the horrible destruction of Jerusalem in the year 70. That temple is now near its completion, the last of its 'living stones' being yet under preparation on earth for being built into the temple in heaven. . . . The real temple of Jehovah's worship is destined to stand eternally as the habitation of his spirit."
Are we to understand that the Christian spiritual temple ceases to function as such at the end of Christ's thousand-year reign when priestly services are no longer required for mankind? If so, then in what sense does the real temple of Jehovah's worship stand eternally as the habitation of his spirit, as above stated?
By the end of the thousand-year reign of the King Jesus Christ all obedient mankind will have received the full benefits of the ransom sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ. They will have been forgiven all their sins due to inheritance from the sinner Adam and will have been uplifted to human perfection in God's image and likeness. This will furnish the foundation for them to be justified to life eternal in God's new world after they have successfully passed the short season of trial when Satan and his demons are released at the end of the thousand-year reign in order to test the exclusive devotion of mankind to Jehovah God as the universal Sovereign. For the faithful ones whom Jehovah then justifies there will be no further need of the benefits of the ransom sacrifice of Jesus Christ. He will therefore no longer serve as a priest with a sacrifice for them.
------------End of quote

The Watchtower describes those here who pass the test as "the faithful ones", meaning those who maintain their integrity during the final test and don't fall away. "Faithful" does not equate to "full of faith". To illustrate, if my wife remains faithful to me in our marriage, that doesn't mean she is full of faith in me. This kind of salvation is not a salvation by faith. Again we see the idea of being raised to human perfection followed by a test. That isn't salvation by faith Corvus. It's salvation by test passing. It's your own personal obedience that is in view, your own retention of human perfection during the test, and not faith in another or "imputed righteousness" or things like that as the basis of God's judgment.

-------------Beginning of quote
*** it-1 603-7 Declare Righteous ***
Other Righteous Ones. In one of Jesus' illustrations, or parables, relating to the time of his coming in Kingdom glory, persons likened to sheep are designated as "righteous ones." (Mt 25:31-46) It is notable, however, that in this illustration these "righteous ones" are presented as separate and distinct from those whom Christ calls "my brothers." (Mt 25:34, 37, 40, 46; compare Heb 2:10, 11.) Because these sheeplike ones render assistance to Christ's spiritual "brothers," thus demonstrating faith in Christ himself, they are blessed by God and are called "righteous ones." Like Abraham, they are accounted, or declared, righteous as friends of God. (Jas 2:23) This righteous standing will mean survival for them when the "goats" depart "into everlasting cutting-off."-Mt 25:46.
A parallel situation may be noted in the vision recorded at Revelation 7:3-17. Here, a "great crowd" of indefinite number are shown as distinct from the 144,000 'sealed ones.' (Compare Eph 1:13, 14; 2Co 5:1.) That this "great crowd" enjoys a righteous standing before God is indicated by the fact that they are described as having "washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb."-Re 7:14.
The "great crowd," who survive the "great tribulation," are not yet declared righteous for life-that is, as worthy of the right to everlasting life on earth. They need to continue partaking of the "fountains of waters of life," as guided by the Lamb, Christ Jesus. They will need to do this during the Millennial Reign of Christ. (Re 7:17; 22:1, 2) If they prove loyal to Jehovah through a final test at the end of the thousand years, they will have their names permanently retained in God's book of life, Jehovah thus declaring, or acknowledging, that they finally are righteous in the complete sense.-Re 20:7, 8; see LIFE (Trees of Life).
-------------End of quote


Again we have the mention of the passing of a final test in order to be counted righteous for life. They are not yet declared to be righteous for life (and I anticipate that you find yourself in this situation), but will only be declared as such when they pass the final test. When they pass the final test. Not when they have faith in Jesus. Not even when they reach human perfection and have faith in Jesus. No, it's their own personal maintaining of human perfection (which they have been raised to during the millennium)


----------Beginning of quote
*** w77 12/15 742-5 How Dependent Are We on Jesus Christ? ***
Besides being a judge of the living, Jesus Christ has also been empowered to judge the dead. The Christian apostle Paul told the Athenians: " has set a day in which he purposes to judge the inhabited earth in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed, and he has furnished a guarantee to all men in that he has resurrected him from the dead." (Acts 17:31) In order for Jesus Christ to judge the dead, he must be able to summon them before him, and this he does by resurrecting them. He himself said: "Do not marvel at this, because the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out."-John 5:28, 29.
When will this be? This will be after the destruction of wicked humans at the "war of the great day of God the Almighty," the binding and abyssing of Satan and his demons, and the start of Jesus Christ's thousand-year reign. (Rev. 16:14; 19:11-21; 20:1-3) During this reign the human race is in the hands of Jesus Christ, and he judges them as to life-their attaining of perfection-or as to death-their meriting death because of failure to avail themselves of the provisions for life. The apostle Paul says that "he must rule as king until God has put all enemies under his feet. As the last enemy, death is to be brought to nothing." (1 Cor. 15:25, 26) Christ has the authority to judge and the power to destroy those who are disobedient to God's laws and who refuse to respect the kingly rulership that God has given him. He even does away with death. Since sin is the cause of death, he removes all Adamic sin from those who are obedient to him. (Rom. 6:23; 1 Cor. 15:56) He brings them to perfection, and when he pronounces them perfect, they will be as perfect as was the first man Adam when created. During the thousand years, Christ does all this work. And, in fact, he is doing all judging now.-John 5:30.
----------End of quote

How dependent are we on Jesus Christ? In regard to the receiving of final salvation for the great crowd, "he judges then as to life- their attaining of perfection- or as to death- their meriting death because of failure…" Once again we have the language of merit here, not the language of faith. Corvus, in the earlier parts of our thread, you said that God has two things in view as the basis for your final salvation, His calling and your faith. I don't see that here at all. I see performance, works, a test, meriting, human perfection.

----------Beginning of quote
*** w52 11/1 670-1 Questions from Readers ***
Questions from Readers
• Revelation 20:7 speaks of the loosing of Satan from the abyss after the 1,000-year reign. Does this final testing come in the closing years of the 1,000-year period, or after it? Does it come within the seventh creative or rest day of 7,000 years, or after its close? Also, does Christ turn the Kingdom back to Jehovah before or after the test by Satan?-W. G., New York.
Revelation 20:7 is explicit in stating that Satan's loosing is after the 1,000-year reign is over: "Now as soon as the thousand years have been ended, Satan will be let loose out of his prison." (NW) In this section we have previously shown that the 1,000-year reign of Christ and the 1,000-year abyssing of Satan and his demons run concurrently, that they start and end together, and that hence when it says of Satan that "after these things he must be let loose for a little while" it is conclusive that the final test comes after the 1,000-year reign has ended. (See The Watchtower, March 15, 1951, and Revelation 20:1-6, NW.) Then it is that Satan and his demons are brought forth from the abyss "for a little while".
Christ's rule for a full thousand years without any encroachment or interference from Satan and his demons allows for the accomplishment of the things foretold at 1 Corinthians 15:24-28 (NW): "He hands over the kingdom to his God and Father, when he has destroyed all government and all authority and power. For he must rule as king until God has put all enemies under his feet. As the last enemy, death is to be destroyed. For God 'subjected all things under his feet'. But when he says that 'all things have been subjected', it is evident that it is with the exception of the one who subjected all things to him. But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the one who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone."
All government and authority and power contrary to Christ's kingship will be eliminated, and at the last even the enemy death will be destroyed. That is to say, the death resultant from Adam will vanish by Christ's wiping out every evil trace of that death and its consequences in the human family. From then on the human family could live forever in their physical perfection. They would no longer die because they were descendants from Adam, all condemnation inherited from him being gone. Then it is that Christ turns over the Kingdom government to Jehovah God, that He might be "all things to everyone". It is necessary for Jesus to do this, because Jesus himself cannot grant everlasting life to this group of human creatures. The Scripture principle remains true that it is Jehovah God who justifies, or, in modern translation, "God is the One who declares them righteous."-Rom. 8:33, NW.
Now, if God is going to justify them or declare them righteous and worthy of everlasting life he must be the one that acts as a judge. Jesus, by his Kingdom for a thousand years, has acted as a screen over mankind so that the wrath of God might not be exercised against them while he is uplifting them to human perfection and sinlessness. Then at the end of the thousand years when he turns over the Kingdom to God he also turns over the human family for God's attention and for God to act directly as the judge of the human family. In order that he can apply a test on which he can base judgment for or against, he lets the Devil loose. He uses Jesus to loose the Devil because Jesus is the one who abyssed the Devil and demons. Out they come, and they put humanity to the test.
----------End of quote


"In order that he can apply a test on which to base judgment for or against, he lets the Devil loose." So the basis for God's judgment of you, whether or not you will receive everlasting life, is based on your personal performance during this test administered at the end of the Millennium. The basis for you to receive everlasting life is your own personal performance during this test. I think the most explicit statement that I've found that brings all of these elements together is the Watchtower publication "Life Everlasting in Freedom of the Sons of God".

---------Beginning of quote
Eventually, by the close of the thousand years of Christ's reign and of Satan's imprisonment in the abyss, all the willing and obedient of Christ's earthly human subjects will be uplifted to human perfection. All traces of sin and of death that mankind has inherited by birth from the sinner Adam will have been wiped out; the "law of sin and of death" will have been abolished from all living inhabitants of the earth. This will mark the realization of the apostle John's vision: "And the sea gave up those dead in it, and death and Ha`'es gave up those dead in them, and they were judged individually according to their deeds. And death and Ha'des were hurled into the lake of fire. This means the second death, the lake of fire." Ah, yes, because of the priestly, governmental work of God's Messianic kingdom over mankind on Farth, "death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be any more. The former things have passed away." (Revelation 20:13, 14; 21:4) With what freedom the glorious earthly paradise will then ring!

36 All mankind will then be, like the perfect man Adam in the garden of Eden, free moral agents, with no inborn sin or weakness or bad inclination to enslave them to a certain course of action. Now, without any disability but with vaster understanding and experiences, they can demonstrate to God directly that their unchangeable choice, their unbreakable decision, is to worship and serve the only living and true God forever on their paradise earth. Hence, before adopting them as his free sons through Jesus Christ, Jehovah God will subject all these perfected human creatures to a thorough test for all time. To this end Jesus Christ will turn over the kingdom to God the heavenly Father. (I Corinthians 15:24?28) The thousand years of Christ's reign having grandly accomplished its purpose, Satan the Devil and his demons will be loosed from their imprisonment of a thousand years in the abyss. How these unreformed, wicked spirit forces, invisible to perfected mankind, will proceed in trying to mislead as many as they can, if not all, Revelation 20:7?10 does not explain. But try they will!

37 Since their being hurled down to earth by the war in heaven that followed the birth of God's Messianic kingdom, "neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven." (Revelation 12:7, 8) Consequently, the ones to be tested then will be, not the holy angels of heaven, but only perfected mankind on earth. The Holy Bible indicates that, just as the perfect, enlightened Adam fell into sin in Eden, so an indefinite number of perfected, human free moral agents will let themselves be misled through selfishness. (James 1:1315) These willful rebels will be summarily executed, in a destruction as complete and everlasting as by fire, because they failed to prove worthy of being justified by the great Judge Jehovah God. Thus they fail to have their names forever inscribed on his "book of life." Revelation 20:15 had warned them: "Furthermore, whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire." They suffer forever "the second death." They have failed to vindicate the loving purpose of Jehovah God in providing salvation for mankind through his Son Jesus Christ and the Messianic kingdom. They receive the same everlasting punishment that is reserved for the very ones whom they let mislead them, Satan the Devil and his demons.?Revelation 20:9, 10.

38 Frustrated in his evil?minded design to mislead the entire race of restored mankind into destruction, Satan and his demons will be hurled into that "lake of fire" that symbolizes endless death. He has failed to undo the blessing and sanctifying of God's great seventh creative day. (Genesis 2:1?3) In utter defeat Satan the great Serpent and his viperous brood will lie prone, his head crushed under the heel of Jesus Christ and his heavenly brothers, the Seed of God's woman, whom Jehovah God will use as his executioner of the Serpent and his seed.?Hebrews 2:14; Romans 16:20; Genesis 3:15.

39 What a rapturous result follows this! All the realm of the living, both the limitless invisible heavens and the paradise earth, are forever free of wickedness in action, free of the presence and activity of wicked angels and men. Jehovah God will justify, declare righteous, on the basis of their own merit all perfected humans who have withstood that final, decisive test of mankind. He will adopt and acknowledge them as his sons through Jesus Christ. (Romans 8:33) They will be ushered into the glorious freedom of the sons of God. All earth perfected will be a paradise of freedom for humans sons of God. (Life Everlasting in Freedom of the Sons of God, 1966, pp. 397-400)
---------End of quote


Although that is an extended quote, I think it is worthwhile to see all of it in context. Particularly paragraph 39, which states as clearly as possible, "Jehovah God will justify, declare righteous, on the basis of their own merit all perfected humans who have withstood that final decisive test of mankind." As you can see earlier in the quote, this is due to the fact that you will have been perfected during the millennium and have been freed from the damaging effects, influence, and guilt of sin.


I mentioned at the beginning of this note that I was interested in discussions about salvation by works or by faith. Corvus, you have conducted yourself in an exemplary fashion during this discussion. I have enjoyed our exchange and hope that we can continue to dialog in the future, perhaps even in this thread. I do not want to end this in a name calling exchange about salvation by works. But I have to be straight up with you. Your final salvation is based on your own works, not on faith. I can't agree with the position that the Watchtower has taken. That's where it's at, not that it makes two shakes of difference to you. I don't know how or if this discussion will affect you, but I know that it has helped me understand the difference between what I know and believe about salvation and what the Watchtower teaches. Although many Jehovah's Witnesses may howl at the accusation made by evangelicals that the Watchtower teaches salvation by works, I have come to the conclusion that the Watchtower does in fact teach it. Your final justification before God will be based on your own personal merit, according to the Watchtower. That is salvation by works. I don't know what else it could possibly be called.

Corvus, at the beginning of this discussion we spent quite some time on establishing what you felt was the basis that God would use to judge if you would receive everlasting life or punishment. Do you still hold to the same convictions you expressed then, or has your understanding changed? One last question, given what the Watchtower has written as documented above, do you think that the debate between evangelicals and Jehovah's Witnesses concerning salvation by works has any grounds or not?

If you choose to continue this thread, I await your reply. I know you are busy with family and the anticipated arrival of your baby. This is an extended post for me, but as I said earlier, I did not do that with the intent of snowing you under a blizzard of material. I simply thought it was necessary to explain what I've found. I think the subject that we're discussing is an important one and that's why I've made a significant time investment in pursuing it.

You have my best wishes for a safe, healthy, and joyous arrival of your child.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-02-02, 05:02 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
27. "Long reply :-)"
In response to message #25
 
   G'day Dave

>Although that is an extended quote, I think it is worthwhile
>to see all of it in context. Particularly paragraph 39,
>which states as clearly as possible, "Jehovah God will
>justify, declare righteous, on the basis of their own merit
>all perfected humans who have withstood that final decisive
>test of mankind." As you can see earlier in the quote, this
>is due to the fact that you will have been perfected during
>the millennium and have been freed from the damaging
>effects, influence, and guilt of sin.
>

See below for how we look at works and faith in connection with salvation.

>I mentioned at the beginning of this note that I was
>interested in discussions about salvation by works or by
>faith. Corvus, you have conducted yourself in an exemplary
>fashion during this discussion. I have enjoyed our exchange
>and hope that we can continue to dialog in the future,
>perhaps even in this thread. I do not want to end this in a
>name calling exchange about salvation by works. But I have
>to be straight up with you. Your final salvation is based
>on your own works, not on faith. I can't agree with the
>position that the Watchtower has taken. That's where it's
>at, not that it makes two shakes of difference to you. I
>don't know how or if this discussion will affect you, but I
>know that it has helped me understand the difference between
>what I know and believe about salvation and what the
>Watchtower teaches. Although many Jehovah's Witnesses may
>howl at the accusation made by evangelicals that the
>Watchtower teaches salvation by works, I have come to the
>conclusion that the Watchtower does in fact teach it. Your
>final justification before God will be based on your own
>personal merit, according to the Watchtower. That is
>salvation by works. I don't know what else it could
>possibly be called.
>
>Corvus, at the beginning of this discussion we spent quite
>some time on establishing what you felt was the basis that
>God would use to judge if you would receive everlasting life
>or punishment. Do you still hold to the same convictions
>you expressed then, or has your understanding changed? One
>last question, given what the Watchtower has written as
>documented above, do you think that the debate between
>evangelicals and Jehovah's Witnesses concerning salvation by
>works has any grounds or not?
>

I still say we don't belive in salvation by works. Okay on the face of it, looking through the eyes of a Protestant, it may appear that way. But the fact is it is our faith that justifies us in God's eyes. I could open hospitals, perform exorcisms, heal the sick, preach 300 hours a month, give time or dollars to every charity I come across but still not be worthy of salvation if I don't have faith. I can also say I have faith and believe that I am saved, but if my faith does not move me to act on Christ's words or to do what he told me to do then my faith is dead and if my faith is dead it is worthless in God's eyes. James spelt it out clearly in Chapter 2 from verse 14 on (NASB):

14 What use is it, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but he has no works? Can that faith save him?
15 If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food,
16 and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, be warmed and be filled," and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that?
17 Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself.
18 But someone may well say, "You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works."
19 You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder.
20 But are you willing to recognize, you foolish fellow, that faith without works is useless?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up Isaac his son on the altar?
22 You see that faith was working with his works, and as a result of the works, faith was perfected;
23 and the Scripture was fulfilled which says, "AND ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS RECKONED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS," and he was called the friend of God.
24 You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.
25 In the same way, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?
26 For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead.

We do not teach that we will earn salvation or that it will come by our works alone. We cannot merit salvation by doing things, no matter how good those things are. We can only merit salvation by our faith in Christ and in God. True, faith is a gift of God, but the decision to exercise that gift comes purely from us - God doesn't twist our arm and force us to do anything, we look at what his word tells us and we petition him for a clean conscience. From this he gives us our faith and we then choose how we will exercise that faith. We demonstrate our faith by our works and God, who looks on in secret will reward us for our faith, not for the works, the faith. We can no more earn our salvation by our own works than we can pick up Mount Everest and move it to Antarctica with our bare hands. The final test is along this basis, God holds out a gift to us, there is no force on his part - the test is do we accept his gift or do we throw it back in his face? If we have a living faith we will accept his gift and the "test" is passed, if we reject it we "fail" the test and will suffer the "second death."

But this is not the same as saying, "if I do X work, I will be saved" - that is against our teachings and more importantly the Bible's teachings. But you must keep in mind "faith without works is dead" and "You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone." (Jas 2:24 NASB). God's word clearly teaches that our works are essential to our salvation, why? Because as Jesus said:

44 "For each tree is known by its own fruit. For men do not gather figs from thorns, nor do they pick grapes from a briar bush. 45 "The good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth what is good; and the evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth what is evil; for his mouth speaks from that which fills his heart.

Builders and Foundations

46 "Why do you call Me, 'Lord, Lord,' and do not do what I say? 47 " Everyone who comes to Me and hears My words and acts on them, I will show you whom he is like: 48 he is like a man building a house, who dug deep and laid a foundation on the rock; and when a flood occurred, the torrent burst against that house and could not shake it, because it had been well built. 49 "But the one who has heard and has not acted accordingly, is like a man who built a house on the ground without any foundation; and the torrent burst against it and immediately it collapsed, and the ruin of that house was great." (NASB)

Our works are the foundation upon which our faith is built, we must do what Christ told us to do and we must act on his words, this is not a passive thing - just saying "I have faith" and believing that you are saved - it is an active thing. We can only be justified if our faith is built on a strong foundation of good works, deeds that will allow us to be resurrected to righteousness if we die.

It is in this way that we view works, faith without works is dead and the reverse is true, works without faith are worthless also. At the last, when the judgement is carried out, if we have not done what we were commanded to do we will not have our name written down in the scroll of life. We don't teach a justification of works, we teach a justification of active faith producing works.

Our idea of faith lies somewhere in between Catholicism and Protestantism, closer to the latter. It appears to me that Protestants have a deeply ingrained fear of appearing to be trying to earn their salvation as the Catholics allow for and so have a straight down the line teaching - faith + nothing = salvation. But the fact is "man cannot be saved by faith alone" we are justified by works in connection with our faith. This is not the same as saying "200 Hail Mary's will get uncle Gino out of purgatory" - this is a complete waste of time. But at the same time saying, "I have faith and I am saved" and then never doing anything that Christ commanded us to do or acting on his words is also a waste of time.

I will post James words one more time:

24 You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.

>If you choose to continue this thread, I await your reply.
>I know you are busy with family and the anticipated arrival
>of your baby. This is an extended post for me, but as I
>said earlier, I did not do that with the intent of snowing
>you under a blizzard of material. I simply thought it was
>necessary to explain what I've found. I think the subject
>that we're discussing is an important one and that's why
>I've made a significant time investment in pursuing it.
>

Thank you for that. I am quite happy to continue the thread, explaining what we teach on this issue, as long as you wish to.

>You have my best wishes for a safe, healthy, and joyous
>arrival of your child.
>
>Sincerely,
>Dave

Thank you for that kind thought .

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Robert_V_Frazier click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-8-02
578 posts, 9 feedbacks, 18 points
Sep-02-02, 06:10 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Robert_V_Frazier Click to send private message to Robert_V_Frazier Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
28. "Some observations"
In response to message #27
 
   1. I note with disappointment that you didn't address anything Dave wrote or anything he quoted from The Watchtower.

2. You say both that works are the foundation on which faith is built (an anti-biblical idea), and that active faith produces good works (which is what the Bible teaches). There is a cause-and-effect relationship between faith and works, but the two are not each other's cause and simultaneously each other's effect!

3. You say, "Our idea of faith lies somewhere in between Catholicism and Protestantism, closer to the latter." I think if you read any Roman Catholic theologians on this subject, you will find your position is nearly identical to Roman Catholic teaching on this subject. It's not close to Protestant teaching at all.

4. Touching on number 1. above, it is far from certain that the Watchtower Society can be included in your pronoun "our" when you write of "our idea of faith". Your (singular "you", meaning Corvus alone) idea of faith does not have much in common with that of the Society, as quoted in the articles Dave posted from. Who else besides yourself holds this particular idea about faith and works? Can you document from the Society's publications that you and they agree?

5. It's important to note that it's not protestant theologians who draw the sharp dichotomy between faith and works, and insist that the latter cannot and does not have any part in bringing about salvation -- it's the Apostle Paul, writing by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. He was taught that by Jesus Christ Himself.

6. James does not contradict Paul, as he is not talking about how to be justified before God (salvation is by grace through faith, and not of works, so that no man can boast), but rather how to be justified before men ("each tree is known by its own fruit"). James 2:18 is not a prayer: "But someone may well say, 'You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works.'" That's a conversation between two men.

Robert V. Frazier

The Watchtower is not the instrument of any man or any set of men, nor is it published according to the whims of men. No man's opinion is expressed in The Watchtower. (The Watchtower 1931 November 1 p.327) If you believe that, you'll believe anything!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
desertfoxmb click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-16-02
94 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-02-02, 06:47 PM (PST)
Click to EMail desertfoxmb Click to send private message to desertfoxmb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
29. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #28
 
   Great point on #5 & 6 Robert. I was just trying to organize my thoughts on the distinction between justification in James 2:22-24 and salvation as taught by Paul when I skimmed through your post. Yours is a much more succint version of what I was trying to clob together.

God bless you brother.

Corvus, I also would like to see a response to the WT quotes posted by Dave. I think I almost understand where you are coming from, but perhaps a bit more clarification on how what you stated were your beliefs on salvation as compared to the WT quotes would be helpful.

Praise the Lord! Hallelujah!

In Christ,
Fred


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-02-02, 07:42 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
31. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #28
 
   >1. I note with disappointment that you
>didn't address anything Dave wrote or anything he quoted
>from The Watchtower.
>

I did, I just chose to address the essence of what Dave was asking about rather than the substance. His question related to whether we teach salvation by works, as in whether we teach that we can earn salvation by our good works or stand before God on our own merits. If Dave wishes me to expound further on this subject I will do so gladly.

>2. You say both that works are the foundation on which faith
>is built (an anti-biblical idea), and that active faith
>produces good works (which is what the Bible teaches).
>There is a cause-and-effect relationship between faith and
>works, but the two are not each other's cause and
>simultaneously each other's effect!
>

That is what Christ said, to do what he said and to act upon his words is the foundation of a strong faith. To do and to act is not a passive thing, both require works, deeds to achieve. Faith and works are inseperably tied together, you cannot be saved by faith alone and you cannot be saved by works alone - God's word is perfectly clear on this matter.

>3. You say, "Our idea of faith lies somewhere in between
>Catholicism and Protestantism, closer to the latter." I
>think if you read any Roman Catholic theologians on this
>subject, you will find your position is nearly identical to
>Roman Catholic teaching on this subject. It's not close to
>Protestant teaching at all.
>

I have read the Catholic theologians and I have also seen what the laity are taught, my family on my father's side are Scots Catholics. They believe that by saying hail mary's, doing penance, going on pilgrimages, making donations to the church, burning candles and other works are the means to your salvation and even for the salvation of those supposedly held in purgatory or limbo. We don't believe in anything remotely like that.

>4. Touching on number 1. above, it is far from certain that
>the Watchtower Society can be included in your pronoun "our"
>when you write of "our idea of faith". Your (singular
>"you", meaning Corvus alone) idea of faith does not have
>much in common with that of the Society, as quoted in the
>articles Dave posted from. Who else besides yourself holds
>this particular idea about faith and works? Can you
>document from the Society's publications that you and they
>agree?
>

Not really, I don't happen to carry my library with me to work and I cannot install the CD on my computer. However two decades of teaching from the platform gives me a broader view of what our teachings are than you can get from reading only our literature. I have never personally known a Witness who believes that the Society teaches as you seem to believe we do. Our teaching is what I wrote, "faith without works is dead" and "a man is justified by works and not by faith alone" (incidentally that is the only occurance of the phrase in the NT). I don't just pluck what I believe out of thin air, I have studied for 20 years and I derive what I believe from these teachings checked against Scripture. Justification, in our teachings and the Bible's, requires works combined with faith.

>5. It's important to note that it's not protestant
>theologians who draw the sharp dichotomy between faith and
>works, and insist that the latter cannot and does not have
>any part in bringing about salvation -- it's the Apostle
>Paul, writing by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. He was
>taught that by Jesus Christ Himself.
>
>6. James does not contradict Paul, as he is not talking
>about how to be justified before God (salvation is by grace
>through faith, and not of works, so that no man can boast),
>but rather how to be justified before men ("each tree is
>known by its own fruit"). James 2:18 is not a prayer: "But
>someone may well say, 'You have faith and I have works; show
>me your faith without the works, and I will show you my
>faith by my works.'" That's a conversation between two
>men.

You talk as if James words don't apply to what Paul taught - James 2:14-26 is not just a conversation between two men, it is a demonstration of what sort of faith we must have, a faith that is combined with works. It was an answer to the objection that we are saved by faith alone and that talking of works in combination with salvation is the same as saying that we can earn our salvation - this is not so. Faith is proved by works, faith without works is dead, dead faith is useless and will lead to destruction not salvation. He is also answering the objection that our faith can be shown by our works, a man who says such a thing is boasting in his works, this also is foolishness. Boasting in your works is prideful and pride comes before a fall, saying I am saved because I have works is prideful and will lead to destruction as surely as a dead faith will.

There is a balance between Paul and James, a balance that only Jehovah's Witnesses seem to have found. Protestant theologians take Paul and isolate him from the rest of Scripture, particularly James, when it comes to faith and works. Faith is the tree, works are the fruitage of that faith - one comes from the other. Jesus also described our works, doing his commandments and acting on his words, as the rock upon which we build our faith and avoid a spiritual wreck.

No matter how you cut it faith and works lead to salvation - faith + nothing = death, works + nothing = death, faith with works = salvation.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iknowhim
Member since Aug-11-02
149 posts
Sep-02-02, 09:13 PM (PST)
Click to EMail iknowhim Click to send private message to iknowhim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
32. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #31
 
   c Faith and works are inseperably tied together, you cannot be saved by faith alone and you cannot be saved by works alone - God's word is perfectly clear on this matter.

i Corvus, what works did the thief on the cross next to Jesus do?

Paul and James are not deuling front to front , but are back to back facing enemies of the truth. Paul is against the "judiazers" who want to put people back under the "law" by making them work for there salvation. Paul makes it clear, as does Peter, that the Law of God KILLS us. It is perfect and cannot be followed. If we could not work for our salvation, it must come another way. That way is faith. Faith in Christ, not by works, because by works no flesh shall be saved. Paul makes it very clear no matter how much work you do it will not save you if you have no faith in Christ.

James on the other hand is fighting those in the congregation who are saying that we do not need to to any works after we are saved. These folks are not saved. No one who is saved would preach that. Bornagain beleivers do the works of God because they are God's children, not out of compulsion (like Jw's btw). These people had no faith. That is the point James is making. They never did. They were like the demons who know God but are not KNOWN by Him. Faith has to have an objesct Corvus. Faith is like swallowing. You can swallow poison, or food. One kills you the other keeps you alive. Many today go to church and make profession of Christ and even do good works, but they do not have a saving faith. Paul would have said the same thing to those people. It's just that he was facing a different crowd.

Jw's are just like the people paul was facing and battleing every day. They are do and don't "christians" who constantly are looking at others "fruit" to see if it is "right". Constant guilt is how I remember it being. Have I gone out in service enough? Have I answered enough. Was my "talk" or "part on the service meeting" enough? The circuit overseer would come and see if we were doing enough in "helping" the brothers get in more time. Is it ever enough Corvus? No we must do more to ensure that God will love us and accept us. More more more. it's never enough. That is the pharisee way, the Jw way.

The bible says all our works are as FILTHY RAGS before God. The only thing that God is interested in is what you will do with His Son.

The people once ask Jesus "What shall we do to do that we may work the works of God?" Jesus answered them and said, "This is the work of God, that you beleive in Him whom he has sent. John6:28,29

John 5:24... Jesus says Truly, truly, I say to you he who hears my word and BELEIVES Him that sent Me, HAS eternal life, and does not come into judgement, but has passed out of death into life.

When we have faith in the true Christ we are reborn into the likeness of His Son. After that we can do Good works, not before.

iknowhim


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-02-02, 09:51 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
33. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #32
 
   It is funny, I swear this is what I keep saying, yet time after time people read my posts stating precisely what you have written here and then say to me, "so you believe that you are justified by works?" when I have plainly said what you just said here.

I clearly said in my post to Dave that faith and works are intertwined, I repeated this fact in my post to Robert - faith is the tree and works are the fruitage of that tree, works are the rock mass that our faith is built on and prevents us from suffering wreck in our faith. We start out with faith that God gives us and then do good works, these good works then go to strengthen our faith and the faith of those around us and so on and so forth.

Also, our faith and our works are never under compulsion - not from God and not from the Society. We have to do works or we cannot be saved, but those works are not to please the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society nor any other man for that matter. I only average a few hours of preaching a month, our congregational average is over fifteen hours, yet despite the fact that I only do a few hours a month I have never had an elder come around and say to me that I am not saved because I don't do X number of hours preaching each month. The elder who takes my book study was around on Sunday and he never mentioned this at all, in fact we had a cuppa and a pleasant chat about children and childbirth because my wife is pregnant. The only thing I feel compells me is my love for my God and my neighbour, no one stands over me with a big stick forcing me to do good works. If you, as a Witness, felt guilty over not doing enough then you had the wrong attitude, not the Society. If your elders made you feel bad about not doing more, then they had the wrong attitude. You must serve because of love, not guilt and that is a lesson that has been rammed home to me for two whole decades.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iknowhim
Member since Aug-11-02
149 posts
Sep-04-02, 09:00 AM (PST)
Click to EMail iknowhim Click to send private message to iknowhim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
36. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #33
 
   c Also, our faith and our works are never under compulsion - not from God and not from the Society.

i That is not true. The society has said over and over again that it is only Jehovah that will be the Judge as to who has done enough. Some may put in 120 hours amonth for years and not be approved because they did it out of a wrong motive. No one can know if they have done enough, had the right heart condition. EVER!

c I only average a few hours of preaching a month, our congregational average is over fifteen hours, yet despite the fact that I only do a few hours a month I have never had an elder come around and say to me that I am not saved

i That is because the society teaches no one can know if they are saved. They couldn't tell you if you are or aren't.

c If you, as a Witness, felt guilty over not doing enough then you had the wrong attitude, not the Society. If your elders made you feel bad about not doing more, then they had the wrong attitude. You must serve because of love, not guilt and that is a lesson that has been rammed home to me for two whole decades.

i I as a witness went from a self-righteous position feeling I had done enough, to a self loathing position, knowing I was a condemned sinner. Do you go though this cycle Corvous? Are you perfect?

John said " I write you these things...in order that you might know tha you have eternal life."

Now that I am bornagain I know I have eternal life. No one can take it from me and I cannot lose it. I never had the assurance of salvation when I was a witness, because they do not teach or know it.
If you beleive that you have it, you don't understand the teaching of Jehovah's witnesses.

iknowhim.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-04-02, 03:54 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
37. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #36
 
   > i That is not true. The society has said over and over
>again that it is only Jehovah that will be the Judge as to
>who has done enough. Some may put in 120 hours amonth for
>years and not be approved because they did it out of a wrong
>motive. No one can know if they have done enough, had the
>right heart condition. EVER!
>

Still not compulsion from the Society, if there is anything compelling a person to serve it is the faith and love in their own heart. Also people will know if they are written into the book of life, at the end of the millenium when the scrolls are opened and they are judged as to their worthiness.

> i That is because the society teaches no one can know if
>they are saved. They couldn't tell you if you are or aren't.
>

Well, that is fact, unless you have had Christ come down and whisper in your ear that you are saved? It is not for men to know whether or not they are saved or not until the judgement is made and that judgement by Christ not us - remember my friend that many who say "Lord, lord..." will be rejected by the very one they claim to follow and who believe that they are saved and cannot lose the promise, they can. Remember also that "Pride comes before a fall" and "let him that thinks he is standing beware that he does not fall".

> i I as a witness went from a self-righteous position
>feeling I had done enough, to a self loathing position,
>knowing I was a condemned sinner. Do you go though this
>cycle Corvous? Are you perfect?
>

Am I perfect? Far from it - "for all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" I am a sinner like everyone else. However I feel satisfied with the portion that God has given me, I am working hard to support my growing family which is the first consideration of a Christian husband and in addition to that I also get in some time preaching when the opportunity presents itself. I don't beat myself up if I don't get a vast number of hours in.

>John said " I write you these things...in order that you
>might know tha you have eternal life."
>
>Now that I am bornagain I know I have eternal life. No one
>can take it from me and I cannot lose it. I never had the
>assurance of salvation when I was a witness, because they do
>not teach or know it.
>If you beleive that you have it, you don't understand the
>teaching of Jehovah's witnesses.
>
>iknowhim.

We have the assurance of salvation, but we are not so arrogant as to claim to know the mind of Christ or who he has decided who is saved and who is not. We are satisfied that we have the sure promise and that if Christ so wills then we will receive the gift promised at the end of the millenium. I do not presume to tell Christ that I am saved, he tells me, he is my king, my Lord and I am his servant - he will give me the reward he decides I will have not the reward I think I should have. As I pointed out above, in the end many of those who believe they are saved will lose that hope because they are "workers of lawlessness". In the end a Christian is not saved because he or she believes that he or she is "born again" and therefore assured of salvation no matter what, a Christian is saved because Christ judges you as worthy and your name is written down in the book of life.

Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com

  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-04-02, 04:32 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
38. "Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that..."
In response to message #37
 
   Corvus understands the teachings of Jehovah's witnesses very well.

And I am sure any other Jehovah's witness can certify this also.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iknowhim
Member since Aug-11-02
149 posts
Sep-04-02, 07:20 PM (PST)
Click to EMail iknowhim Click to send private message to iknowhim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
40. "RE: Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that."
In response to message #38
 
   Aren't you the one that refuses to beleive what the WT said explicitly about salvation? Or is that Corvus to?

iknowhim.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-05-02, 05:00 AM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
43. "RE: Very well said Corvus. And I, as a Jehovah's Witness, can certify that."
In response to message #40
 
   iknowhim wrote:
"Aren't you the one that refuses to beleive what the WT said explicitly about salvation?"

I believe what the WT said, but I don't believe your interpretation of the WT.

iknowhim wrote:
"Or is that Corvus to?"

Corvus can answer himself.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iknowhim
Member since Aug-11-02
149 posts
Sep-05-02, 01:19 PM (PST)
Click to EMail iknowhim Click to send private message to iknowhim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
48. "what the wt said is plain for all to see"
In response to message #43
 
   What is in question is your ablility to hold two truths about the subject. I think you should drop one. Make up your mind please. You look very foolish at this point.

iknowhim


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
JR click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-26-02
349 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
Sep-05-02, 02:50 AM (PST)
Click to EMail JR Click to send private message to JR Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
42. "Um...Jonny, your ability to..."
In response to message #38
 
   "certify" or make something credible is sort of up in the air right now, considering your discussion with me and your lack of response to my last post.


Here it is again, just in case you missed it:

Jonny typed
>JR, you wrote:
>"Jonny, the last two sentences ­ in particular the LAST
>sentence above ­ are what I want you to focus on. Just in
>case you miss it, here it is again: "To receive everlasting
>life in the earthly Paradise we must identify that
>organization and serve God as part of it." Notice the use of
>the word "must" ­ that makes this a requirement."
>
>It doesn't say how God will judge humans, it says what God
>requires from humans. Judging and requiring are two
>different things.

* I feel I must ask you to read the quote again, and please remember that this is the official communication and position of the WT. The WT plainly says here that a person MUST (that's the word, and the word makes this a requirement) serve God as part of "God's organization" - the Watchtower - in order to receive everlasting life. This does indeed make being a JW a requirement if one desires to "pass" God's judgment and receive everlasting life. There is no other way to take this.

>God requires something today, but he will judge tomorrow,
>not based by the requirements, but what each and every human
>has hidden in their hearts.

* I'm sorry, but that's not what your leaders at headquarters have said. If one MUST be part of "God's organization" to receive everlasting life, then the requirement of whether a person is a JW or not is indeed the standard by which God will judge people - that's what the article states.

>Compare with what Watchtower says about the second
>requirement, do you draw the same conclusion as the third
>requirement?
>Do you really believe that the Watchtower
>teaches here that only they who meet up with God's laws will
>be saved? No, the Watchtower doesn't teach salvation by
>deeds. Instead it says that God requires humans to
>follow his laws today, but because nobody is able to fulfill
>the laws(humans are imperfect) God will judge them according
>to their hearts tomorrow.

* First or all, this discussion is not talking about the second requirement; it has (at least I have tried to be) focused on the third. Secondly, where are you getting your ideas? Where does the Watchtower SAY that God will judge people "according to their hearts tomorrow." You see, Jonny, that may well be YOUR personal belief. But, my point is - what you are saying and what your JW leaders have said are two different things.

>You are all here on the board putting more meaning in the
>article than it says. And it is because you have all been
>mislead by Jehovah's Witnesses enemies, the opposing
>apostates and their literature.

* I'm sorry, but you are quite wrong about this. I am NOT putting more meaning in the article - I am reading what it says and saying what it means by what it says. Words mean things - that's why we have dictionaries. And the word "must" makes being part of the WT - being a JW - a requirement for salvation and receiving everlasting life. And, since it is a requirement for salvation, it IS being taught by the Society as a standard by which God will judge people.

>Ask Jehovah's Witnesses about their own faith, nobody else.

* I did - I went to the article written by the WT leadership and read what it said. With all due respect, Jonny, it is what THEY say, and not what YOU say that defines what JW's believe. And that article spells it out plainly for all to see.

JR


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-05-02, 05:04 AM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
44. "RE: Um...Jonny, your ability to..."
In response to message #42
 
   I have already explained my interpretation on the article, here it is:

http://www.carmforums.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=828&forum=DCForumID17&omm=14&viewmode=threaded

In my opinion you don't seem to make mental notes of what I am writing, so I don't see the point in continuing to convince you. If you don't believe what I say, then ask any Jehovah's Witness you want about this, I am sure you get the same answer.

Then who is the best to interpret what it says in the Watchtower, Jehovah's Witnesses or others, you can even send a letter to them who wrote the article and ask them, they should at least know what they are talking about.

Jonny


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
JR click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-26-02
349 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
Sep-05-02, 07:44 AM (PST)
Click to EMail JR Click to send private message to JR Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
45. "Yes, but your explanation was..."
In response to message #44
 
   LAST EDITED ON Sep-05-02 AT 08:22 AM (PST)
 
>I have already explained my interpretation on the article,
>here it is:
>
>http://www.carmforums.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=828&forum=DCForumID17&omm=14&viewmode=threaded

* ...responded to by me in the above post, and your explanation was found (by me and others) to be lacking; mainly because you do not deal with the use of the term "must".

>In my opinion you don't seem to make mental notes of what I
>am writing, so I don't see the point in continuing to
>convince you. If you don't believe what I say, then ask any
>Jehovah's Witness you want about this, I am sure you get the
>same answer.

* Actually, I use two screens when I respond to what you write: On the first is what you write; on the second is my response to your post. As I explained in the above post (did you really read it?), I DID go to the JWs for an answer - I went to the article written by the leaders of your GB. The article is a very clearly written policy statement, stating the JW position on what a person MUST (that's the key word) do to receive everlasting life - they must be a JW. Your idea of saying "God will not judge people according to what group they belong to" is just simply NOT in agreement with what your JW leaders have stated.

>Then who is the best to interpret what it says in the
>Watchtower, Jehovah's Witnesses or others, you can even
>send a letter to them who wrote the article and ask them,
>they should at least know what they are talking about.

* Well, in terms of "interpreting", the article is written very plainly; it doesn't need much "interpretation" - If you believe it does, please show me where. I am particularly interested in hearing how you define and apply the word "MUST" in the last statement.

Waiting for a response,

JR


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Robert_V_Frazier click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-8-02
578 posts, 9 feedbacks, 18 points
Sep-05-02, 08:45 AM (PST)
Click to EMail Robert_V_Frazier Click to send private message to Robert_V_Frazier Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
46. "Sorry, JR"
In response to message #45
 
   but you're in the final phases of the Jonny response cycle. You've been through the "Watchtower quote? What Watchtower quote?" phase, the "Oh, THAT Watchtower quote! It doesn't agree with me, so it doesn't mean what it says" phase, the "I'm out of here; you people are impossible" phase, and the "I already told you once; it doesn't mean what it says" phase. All that's left is the "I will not respond to any more of your posts because you are rude" phase.

Been there, done that, been told, "I already gave you the t-shirt once". Still no t-shirt and no answers from Jonny. He can't give what he hasn't got, JR.

Robert V. Frazier

The Watchtower is not the instrument of any man or any set of men, nor is it published according to the whims of men. No man's opinion is expressed in The Watchtower. (The Watchtower 1931 November 1 p.327) If you believe that, you'll believe anything!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
JR click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-26-02
349 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
Sep-05-02, 10:49 AM (PST)
Click to EMail JR Click to send private message to JR Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
47. "But, Robert, all he has to do is...."
In response to message #46
 
   explain the word "MUST" in the last statement and what it makes the statement. It's not hard - Any dictionary will give him the definition of the word.

Still waiting, Jonny...

JR


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-05-02, 02:43 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
49. "Ok, I will try to explain the word"
In response to message #47
 
   A Christian must be a part of God's plan to save humans(that is to be part of the preaching work together with other Christians), if he refuses, then he will risk his life when opposing against God's will(1Cor 9:16). But this "must" doesn't automatically save somebody.

It is a must, nobody becomes saved if he oppose against this, that is why you must identify the real Christians, because there are only one true faith in the world (Ephesians 4:5)
If you refuse to identify the real Christians, then there is not much hope to survive. But even if you do identify the real Christians, you are not automatically saved.

To be saved, you can't refuse to identify the real Christians and refuse to join them, you must do this, if you don't want to, then you are lost(The Pharisee's refused to join with Jesus):
"He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad."(Matthew 12:30)

In the same way a Christian must follow God's laws to be saved:
"...that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance."(Acts 26:20)
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."(Matthew 7:21)
"What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works?"(James 2:14)

nobody becomes saved if he oppose against this, if he refuses to follow God's will. But works alone doesn't save somebody(Ephesians 2:8-9)


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Andyman click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
1066 posts, 12 feedbacks, 24 points
Sep-05-02, 03:47 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Andyman Click to send private message to Andyman Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
50. "So the big question now is..."
In response to message #49
 
   Who are the "real" Christians?

You said:To be saved, you can't refuse to identify the real Christians and refuse to join them, you must do this, if you don't want to, then you are lost(The Pharisee's refused to join with Jesus)

Now all you have to do is tell us all who these "real" Christians are!

Take care.

Andyman:


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-05-02, 03:56 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
51. "who do YOU think the real Christians are? N.T"
In response to message #50
 
  


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Andyman click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
1066 posts, 12 feedbacks, 24 points
Sep-05-02, 04:02 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Andyman Click to send private message to Andyman Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
52. "Please don't start this again..."
In response to message #51
 
   Answering a question with another question is not really playing by the rules, now is it?

I asked first, so you tell me and then I will tell you, we have to play fair now, and since I have answered every question you have asked me, I think it's really time you gave ME and answer!

Take care.

Andyman:


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-06-02, 01:42 AM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
54. "You know who I believe are the real Christians, it is..."
In response to message #52
 
   Jehovah's Witnesses.

Now, have you discerned the real Christians on earth?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Truthhurts
Member since Aug-9-02
53 posts, Rate this user
Sep-05-02, 08:07 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Truthhurts Click to send private message to Truthhurts Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
53. "RE: who do YOU think the real Christians are? N.T"
In response to message #51
 
   Hey Jonny, I take it that your line of reasoning is that:
JWs are the true Christians and to be saved you must first indentify them and then join them. If you refuse to join them (reject their teachings) your toast!
This is the JW stance. You are not alone in this belief as this is what the WTS teaches.
So, after the big A God will resurrect every last person that ever lived on the planet that did not get to talk to a JW. How can they be condemned if they never got their chance to indentify and join the JWs???
Now, continuing with this line of reasoning:
All these folks are resurrected and are given 1000 YEARS to get their act together (as if being brought back from the dead wasn't enough inspiration). Talk about unfair! All I get to identify the true christians are JWs??? With all their assumptions on what makes them the true religion??? That's my chance at salvation??? If my salvation requires me to identify the JWs as the true christians, don't you think God could have done a better job? Why would God make the JWs look like man made organization if they aren't? Why would God make the JWs look like false prophets if they aren't? Get it....He wouldn't!
Doesn't make much sense, but that's the JW's line of reasoning.....


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-06-02, 03:55 AM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
56. "Hello."
In response to message #53
 
   Truthhurts wrote:
"Hey Jonny, I take it that your line of reasoning is that:
JWs are the true Christians..."

Yes, Jehovah's Witnesses are the true Christians on earth.

"And they shall be unto me a peculiar treasure, saith Jehovah of hosts, in the day that I prepare; and I will spare them as a man spareth his own son that serveth him. And ye shall return and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not."(Mal 3:17-18)

"By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples..."(John 13:35)

Truthhurts wrote:
"...and to be saved you must first indentify them and then join them."

Yes there is only two choices/roads on the earth according to the Bible(Matthew 7:13-14) the whole world will be divided in two groups, sheep and goats. Goats will eternally die, sheep will have the chance to live forever:
"And these shall go away into eternal punishment, and the righteous into life eternal."(Matthew 25:46)

Truthhurts wrote:
" If you refuse to join them (reject their teachings) your toast!"

Yes, if you have the chance to repent, and if you understand the truth, but reject it, then you will be toast.

Truthhurts wrote:
"This is the JW stance. You are not alone in this belief as this is what the WTS teaches."

Yes of course, I believe in the same way as WTS.

Truthhurts wrote:
"So, after the big A God will resurrect every last person that ever lived on the planet that did not get to talk to a JW. How can they be condemned if they never got their chance to indentify and join the JWs???"

The persons that will be resurrected after the big A will not be condemned, they have the same chance as persons that live today.

Truthhurts wrote:
"Now, continuing with this line of reasoning:
All these folks are resurrected and are given 1000 YEARS to get their act together"

Yes that is right, they will not be condemned as you said, for me it seems like you contradict yourself, but maybe I misunderstand you?

Truthhurts wrote:
" (as if being brought back from the dead wasn't enough inspiration). Talk about unfair! All I get to identify the true christians are JWs??? With all their assumptions on what makes them the true religion??? That's my chance at salvation???"

You still have a chance today, and you will have many chance's tomorrow, it is not too late before God destroys the humans in the big A.
It will become more and more clear who are the right Christians, if you aren't convinced today, maybe you will be tomorrow.

Truthhurts wrote:
"If my salvation requires me to identify the JWs as the true christians, don't you think God could have done a better job? Why would God make the JWs look like man made organization if they aren't? Why would God make the JWs look like false prophets if they aren't?"

The organization IS man made, with some help from God, the JW's aren't false prophets because JW's doesn't make new predictions about the future that doesn't exist in the Bible.

Truthhurts wrote:
"Get it....He wouldn't!"

I understand.

Truthhurts wrote:
"Doesn't make much sense, but that's the JW's line of reasoning....."

I believe you have misunderstood some of Jehovah's Witnesses teachings, but that is only my opinion.
Who the real Christians are, you have to decide for yourself, but the Bible is very clear that the world will be divided in two groups, they who do the will of God, and they who don't. They who do the will of God doesn't have to be Jehovah's Witnesses as a group, there can be individuals that have God's approval without being in the organization, and there can be individuals that doesn't have God's approval yet being in the organization. We will know who has God's approval and who has not in the very day somebody disappears from our side:

"Then two shall be in the field, one is taken and one is left; two grinding at the mill, one is taken and one is left. Watch therefore, for ye know not in what hour your Lord comes."(Matthew 24:40-42)


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
JR click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-26-02
349 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
Sep-06-02, 02:58 AM (PST)
Click to EMail JR Click to send private message to JR Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
55. "What a flip flop!"
In response to message #49
 
   Jonny writes: "To be saved, you can't refuse to identify the real Christians and refuse to join them, you must do this, if you don't want to, then you are lost."

Well, so much for Domo's asking if a person needed to join a certain group in order to be saved, and you saying no, they don't! I'll be interested to read your explanation of this to him.

JR


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iknowhim
Member since Aug-11-02
149 posts
Sep-04-02, 06:51 PM (PST)
Click to EMail iknowhim Click to send private message to iknowhim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
39. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #37
 
   c Also people will know if they are written into the book of life, at the end of the millenium when the scrolls are opened and they are judged as to their worthiness.

i No Corvus, Christians know right now that they are saved RIGHT NOW. Do you know how? Because Jesus says so and we beleive Him. It's not that we are great, Corvus, we have a Great God. And when He saves, he deosn't do it the way we do. He does it perfectly and forever. The reason you do not know it is now (salvation) is that you refuse to beleive the scriptures and there testimony. Romans 8:1


c Well, that is fact, unless you have had Christ come down and whisper in your ear that you are saved?

i It is even beter than that! Jesus comes and lives inside you. He indwells you. It is a promised repeated thru scripture. It has happened to millions. It happened to me. John 14:17,20

c It is not for men to know whether or not they are saved or not until the judgement is made and that judgement by Christ not us - remember my friend that many who say "Lord, lord..." will be rejected by the very one they claim to follow and who believe that they are saved and cannot lose the promise, they can.
i No my Friend these are the ones who serve an organization and spend alot of time in service and think that they know God. Jesus says that He never knew them! They never were indwelt with the spirit of God and hence were never sons of God and they will die in their sins.

c Remember also that "Pride comes before a fall" and "let him that thinks he is standing beware that he does not fall".

i Pride has nothing to do with it. Either you beleive what God has said and you're saved or not. Faith is the only thing that will save you. Faith that God has done as He said.

c We have the assurance of salvation, but we are not so arrogant as to claim to know the mind of Christ or who he has decided who is saved and who is not. We are satisfied that we have the sure promise and that if Christ so wills then we will receive the gift promised at the end of the millenium. I do not presume to tell Christ that I am saved, he tells me, he is my king, my Lord and I am his servant - he will give me the reward he decides I will have not the reward I think I should have. As I pointed out above, in the end many of those who believe they are saved will lose that hope because they are "workers of lawlessness". In the end a Christian is not saved because he or she believes that he or she is "born again" and therefore assured of salvation no matter what, a Christian is saved because Christ judges you as worthy and your name is written down in the book of life.

i None of that is biblical. Christians DO have the mind of Christ (1cor 2:16) Actually you should read this Chapter, the theme is Spiritual knowledge given to christans by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

Christ DECIDES to give eternal life to Christians the moment they beleive. It says so scores of times in the bible. I have quoted tham to you many times. How about this one. Ehpesians 1:1-14.

Please read it and answer the scriptures Covus. They apply to you. The whole bible aplies to you, not some remnant. All the promised are real and they are for you Corvus. I know it for.........Iknowhim



  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Robert_V_Frazier click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-8-02
578 posts, 9 feedbacks, 18 points
Sep-04-02, 07:29 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Robert_V_Frazier Click to send private message to Robert_V_Frazier Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
41. "RE: Some observations"
In response to message #39
 
   I couldn't say it better myself, Iknowhim. The Bible tells us of God's promise of salvation and eternal life to all who believe in Jesus Christ. It is not pride, but humble gratitude and trust that prompts me and you and all Christians to tell the good news -- we are saved, eternal life starts the second you put your trust in Christ, our names are right now today written in the Lamb's Book of Life, and God will not blot them out!

We can and do know this because

3 At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures. We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another. 4 But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, 6 whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life. Titus 3:3-7, emphasis mine

The careful reader will note that all of the verbs I put in bold are in the past tense, indicative mood. Not in the future tense, subjunctive mood. That is, it did hapen in the past, not it may happen in the future.

Any religion whose members cannot whole-heartedly give praise to God for what He has done in the exact same words as Paul used in writing to Titus is not a Christian religion, whatever else it may be.

Halllujah, Jesus Christ has saved me, and because that is true, the day will come when He will receive me into Heaven forever. (Including Heaven's suburb, paradise Earth.) I don't have to wait for Armageddon or the end of the millennial reign to find out -- Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life." (John 5:24) Jesus said it, that settles it, and I believe it!

Robert V. Frazier

The Watchtower is not the instrument of any man or any set of men, nor is it published according to the whims of men. No man's opinion is expressed in The Watchtower. (The Watchtower 1931 November 1 p.327) If you believe that, you'll believe anything!


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Sep-02-02, 07:11 PM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
30. "Brief"
In response to message #27
 
   Corvus,
I saw your reply. I will continue our exchange by sharing some thoughts regarding your note sometime later this week or possibly not until next weekend. This is a busy week for me both at work and with evening meetings at church. I know that a lag is no worry between us so I'll work on it and post when it is done.

Only one preliminary thought to share right now. I intentionally tried to focus our discussion on your final salvation, not the things leading up to it. Why? Because the one that really really matters, the one that "gets you home" so to speak, is your final salvation. I believe that there is some mixing of descriptions for final salvation along with events or processes leading up to it in your reply. In other words, the focus on final salvation has been clouded or lost in your most recent reply by the introduction of other things into the discussion. Let me qualify what I just said. I will say that the focus on final salvation "as taught by the Watchtower organization" has been clouded or lost in your most recent reply.

You've always been straight with me Corvus, so I'll be straight with you. I am glad to hear you repeat what you've said about your final salvation and I'm looking forward to several more exchanges between us on this very important topic. And I'm certain that you would not be surprised to find that I think the position you hold is not the position of the Watchtower organization (and that makes me glad too.)

I'll start working on my reply. Talk to you soon.

Sincerely,
Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corvus click here to view user rating
Member since Feb-24-02
241 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
Sep-03-02, 02:51 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Corvus Click to send private message to Corvus Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
35. "RE: Brief"
In response to message #30
 
   You know, I went back and reread my post and it finally dawned on me that I didn't cover the post millenial salvation

I really don't know what our position is on that anymore, I haven't seen an article that deals with it for many years and the ones I did see were long before my time, such as the ones you posted. I think the Society has taken a bit of a neutral stance - what happens, happens - and God will sort it out for everyone's benefit when the time comes. Most of the talks and articles that I see deal with actually getting to and through Armageddon, rather than what will happen after that time.

That said I would think that the situation will be similar to the premillenial times, ie now, and judging by the articles and extracts you posted the Society thought, or perhaps thinks, along that line too. The way the Scriptures on the subject read there is a time of testing at the end of the millenium where vast numbers of people, who have been living in Christ's kingdom during the millenium, and who suddenly decide to reject the king they have lived under for so long and so happily and join the Dragon when he is released from the Abyss. The "test" would be along the lines of who do you choose - God or Satan? You choose God, you live - choose Satan and you undergo the "second death." This isn't the same as performing works, it is merely a decision of who to put faith in - do you believe God's promises of eternal happiness in his kingdom or do you believe Satan's promises of "becoming like gods, knowing good and evil" and eternal carnal bliss?

The events of the millenium are hazy, probably deliberately so, and in the past years the Society has expressed (mostly verbally through talks) the position that to try and work out this time - especially the end of it - is largely speculation and that God has it in hand, so let's deal with now and the time leading up to the end of this system.

I hope that this clarifies things a little.

Pax
Corvus.

Fęder ure žu že eart on heofonum; Si žin nama gehalgod to becume žin rice gewurže šin willa on eoršan swa swa on heofonum. Urne gedęghwamlican hlaf syle us todęg and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfaš urum gyltendum and ne gelęd žu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele sožlice. (The Lord's prayer in Anglo-Saxon)


www.greektexts.0catch.com


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Sep-08-02, 08:05 PM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
59. "Final Salvation"
In response to message #35
 
   Corvus wrote:
>You know, I went back and reread my post and it finally dawned on me that I didn't cover the post millenial salvation

$$$$$
Corvus, I'm glad that you reread it and caught the drift concerning post-millennial salvation. Why am I focusing on that specific thing? Because it's the only one that "sticks", the only one that really truly saves (in your/Watchtower theology). All the other "salvations" that you might experience are simply precursors to final salvation at the end of the millennium. I fully realize that there are other salvations that the Watchtower discusses. But all they do is give you the opportunity to make it to the final salvation hope that is held out to you. While there may be great sighs of relief at the earlier salvations, I'm sure you will agree that none of those have any permanence to them. They are transient and temporary and don't get you everlasting life. This makes them, in my eyes, secondary issues. The one that is most important is the one that lasts forever, not the temporary ones leading up to the permanent one. I know that for me personally (and I'm assuming for many people), when I ask how to have peace with God, I'm asking about permanent, rock-solid, never-ending peace. I'm not asking about a waypoint half way to peace with God. That's not getting me to true peace that I can bank my hope in. I'm not asking about a temporary cease fire with God. If war with God might break out at a moment's notice, that gives my heart no lasting foundation for hope. When I ask about peace with God, I'm asking about everlasting life, not merely the offer of a possible granting of life that may or may not happen at some future point. If I ask for directions to Sydney, Australia and you tell me that I'll need to travel through an airport in Florida and that's as far as your directions go, you can keep your directions thank you very much. (My wife would not believe this illustration because I never ask for directions -- lol.) I need to know how to get all the way there, not half way there. This is as practical as I can think of to bring this question home to you Corvus. Maybe you don't need an answer to that question, but I do. If you don't, then we are probably not going to make much headway in this discussion because our motivations are in different directions. If the extent of the Watchtower's "good news" only gets you part way home, then at best it is some good news, not the good news.
$$$$$

>I really don't know what our position is on that anymore, I haven't seen an article that deals with it for many years and the ones I did see were long before my time, such as the ones you posted. I think the Society has taken a bit of a neutral stance - what happens, happens - and God will sort it out for everyone's benefit when the time comes. Most of the talks and articles that I see deal with actually getting to and through Armageddon, rather than what will happen after that time.

$$$$$
Well, now you've seen several articles that all explain the Watchtower's position consistently over several years time span. I don't get what you're saying about "long before my time". The Insight volumes were published in 1988 and are still currently in use, aren't they? I thought you mentioned in another thread that you've been studying for 20 years. Several of the articles fall within that time frame. I'm sure that the bound volumes are available to you either on the Watchtower CD or in the Kingdom Hall library. My word Corvus, you make it sound like I'm bringing up some kind of ancient news. We're only talking about 10-15 years ago. Aren't you kind of exaggerating the situation a little? It seems like you are from my viewpoint. I am certainly not ancient and I can remember 15 years ago quite easily. Is the "best if used by" date on Watchtower truth measured in months now instead of decades or more? Many of these articles are not hard to come by. The Insight volumes are current publications.

You say that you "think the society has taken a neutral stance". Well, I always hear the statement "If you want to know what Jehovah's Witnesses believe, ask one." Ok. First I asked your organization through reading its publications. I saw a consistent testimony spread over many years explaining the same viewpoint of the organization. That carries some weight with me. Maybe it doesn't carry any weight with you. That might be the case. But I can't speak to your feelings. All I can express is what I understand based on the reading that I've done. Given the fact that the question has been directly and repeatedly addressed in Watchtower publications, I feel safe in drawing the conclusion that I have correctly understood their position. You have offered no documentation on "new light" regarding this. I've seen no "new light" refuting their earlier position. Yet you respond by stating that you think they have changed their stance. That seems pretty shaky to me Corvus. Look at it from my perspective, a question that I have intense personal interest in has been repeatedly and consistently explained in watchtower publications. So now, when I take the time to try to ask you about it (and don't get me wrong, I do honestly appreciate your time in pursuing this thread), you shrug it off as if nothing was ever said. You give me the impression that this is an unimportant question that the Watchtower isn't concerned with. What am I supposed to walk away with from this experience? I ask the Watchtower what it believes and I get what appears to be a straightforward answer presented in a fashion that leads me to believe that they are deliberately answering the question. Yet when I ask you the same question, what the Watchtower has written carries no weight. Why should I bother to ask a Jehovah's Witness what they believe, if I'm going to receive conflicting answers depending on who I ask? Corvus, you've always been decent with me and normally seem quite able to carry on a discussion with some level of consistency. I think you're falling short on this one though, and I'm seeing precious little reason to take you seriously on this. If the organization's publications are so unclear or filled with conjecture or just plain wrong, then why should I take them or you seriously? I thought one of the biggies in defense of the organization is the unity of belief amongst Jehovah's Witnesses. I'm not smelling anything like unity on this. The org says one thing. You say another that appears to be in direct conflict with what the org has publicly and recently (yes, I consider 15 years recent) published. This is unity?

Since you say that the articles I posted were well before your time (and thus apparently inconsequential or outdated), perhaps I should pursue this with a more mature Jehovah's Witness who has been around for that long and who has direct recollection of the initial publication of these details regarding having peace with God. Is that what I'm supposed to take away from this thread Corvus? That unity only extends between a few mature Jehovah's Witnesses and that I can safely ignore the lesser lights amongst the assembly? You said that most of the articles you remember address getting you to and through Armageddon (kinds of "salvation" that the Watchtower discusses), which is not your final salvation in any sense. Ok, I'll grant you that this is the area addressed by most articles. But that only means that those articles are not designed to go into the extended discussion of what happens after that. It doesn't mean that the Watchtower has rescinded the explicit descriptions and explanations that I offered in my original post. You think the Watchtower has changed its position. Please show me where it has explicitly done so. If that is not possible, I will continue to believe that I have drawn reasonable conclusions from what the Watchtower has said.

It's funny that the Watchtower described the publication of the Insight volumes as follows:
*** w89 3/15 10 "Insight on the Scriptures"-A New Bible Encyclopedia ***
"Insight on the Scriptures includes much of what was formerly in the book Aid to Bible Understanding and a great deal more. In what respects is it different? Scores of sections have been revised and updated. There are also many new articles as well as added features in Insight on the Scriptures.

Refinements
Careful analysis of statements in this publication has been made in the light of the meaning of words used in the original languages of the Bible. Details have also been included to enable the reader to appreciate the Biblical scope of meaning of the original-language words. Additionally, Biblical name meanings have been refined in the light of the way the basic elements of those names are actually rendered in the New World Translation.
A diligent effort has also been made to bring the material in this publication up-to-date with what has been published in The Watchtower in recent years. For example, we have learned much about the heart, the book of life, being declared righteous, and many other things. This information has been embodied in Insight on the Scriptures."

Funny how they explicitly mention "being declared righteous" as one of the areas of special diligence at being up-to-date. They have learned much about it, and tried their level best to communicate it in that publication. It doesn't sound to me like this is a special effort on their part to be speculative, creative, or irrelevant in their treatment of being declared righteous. So while the issue of being declared righteout may not interest you Corvus, it appears to have had special treatment in the Insight volumes published in 1988, and the position they took does not fit with your explanation.
$$$$$


>That said I would think that the situation will be similar to the premillenial times, ie now, and judging by the articles and extracts you posted the Society thought, or perhaps thinks, along that line too. The way the Scriptures on the subject read there is a time of testing at the end of the millenium where vast numbers of people, who have been living in Christ's kingdom during the millenium, and who suddenly decide to reject the king they have lived under for so long and so happily and join the Dragon when he is released from the Abyss. The "test" would be along the lines of who do you choose - God or Satan? You choose God, you live - choose Satan and you undergo the "second death." This isn't the same as performing works, it is merely a decision of who to put faith in - do you believe God's promises of eternal happiness in his kingdom or do you believe Satan's promises of "becoming like gods, knowing good and evil" and eternal carnal bliss?

$$$$$
I seriously doubt if the Society would answer any questions I would send in a letter about this. Would you be willing to ask the Watchtower to explain their official position? I am glad that you have spent some time thinking about the question, but I have no reason to believe that your thoughts reflect a minority, a majority, or the universal position of Jehovah's Witnesses. Since there were explicit references to the basis of judgment being the inherent personal righteousness of those tested, I see what you have written here as personal conjecture on your part. I would think that you would take a personal interest in this for the following reason. Perhaps the instruction you are receiving at your local Kingdom Hall is stunted, incomplete, or inferior to what the organization as a whole intends. I can definitely see a personal benefit in this for you if you would pursue asking the organization for an indication of current light on this question. Maybe your local assembly is getting the short end of the theocratic knowledge stick. Given the fact that you are unsure about the grounds of your final salvation, perhaps you don't know something critical that you should know in order to be saved in other salvations that you anticipate.
$$$$$

>The events of the millenium are hazy, probably deliberately so, and in the past years the Society has expressed (mostly verbally through talks) the position that to try and work out this time - especially the end of it - is largely speculation and that God has it in hand, so let's deal with now and the time leading up to the end of this system.

$$$$$
I would ask you to please write the Society for an explanation. Should you be willing to do so, we can hold off on the discussion until you receive their reply. Let me know if you will do so.


Sincerely,
Dave
$$$$$


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DaveSherrill click here to view user rating
Member since Apr-9-02
67 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
Sep-15-02, 11:48 AM (PST)
Click to EMail DaveSherrill Click to send private message to DaveSherrill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
60. "The end of your rope? The end of this thread?"
In response to message #59
 
   Corvus,
Have we reached the end of this thread? Did you want to rebut my last post or should I go ahead and archive this one?

Dave


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Jonny click here to view user rating
Member since Mar-31-02
240 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
Sep-15-02, 01:19 PM (PST)
Click to EMail Jonny Click to send private message to Jonny Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
61. "RE: The end of your rope? The end of this thread?"
In response to message #60
 
   Hello DaveSherrill, Corvus could be busy, give him some more time.

Anyway, maybe I can answer something, you wrote:

"I thought one of the biggies in defense of the organization is the unity of belief amongst Jehovah's Witnesses. I'm not smelling anything like unity on this. The org says one thing. You say another that appears to be in direct conflict with what the org has publicly and recently (yes, I consider 15 years recent) published. This is unity?"

This view is constantly bombarded by opposers of Jehovah's Witnesses. We don't hold a position as to defend the organization, but to defend the truth, and not work against the organization. There is a BIG difference in opposing the organization and not agree with the organization.
I haven't read exactly what Corvus would think different than the organization, but there is nothing wrong in having a different opinion.
And there is of course unity amongst Jehovah's Witnesses even though there are individual beliefs, unity with each other has nothing to do with personal belief, someone can disagree with teachings and still maintain unity with others.

You also wrote:
"Why should I bother to ask a Jehovah's Witness what they believe, if I'm going to receive conflicting answers depending on who I ask?"

Of course all Jehovah's Witnesses should try to teach what the organization teaches, but humans are imperfect, we don't have such "phariseeic" point of view.

Then you wrote:
"If the organization's publications are so unclear or filled with conjecture or just plain wrong, then why should I take them or you seriously?"

We are all imperfect, even all in God's organization, we are all trying to understand what it says in the Bible, we are all humans. People who say that God's congregation/organization can't be infallible, are in a dangerous path, if they say that their interpretation of the Bible is perfect and never have to change, has already been abased:

"Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes to heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted."(Luke 18:10-14)